Agreement of outer measure and set function in Caratheodory's Extension Theorem

70 Views Asked by At

I'm trying to understand the section of the proof of Caratheodory's Extension Theorem which shows that the outer measure $\mu^*$ agrees with the defined set function $\mu$ on the algebra $\mathcal{A}$, i.e. $\mu^*(A) = \mu(A) \text{ }\forall A \in \mathcal{A}$ My notes state the following:

"Suppose $A \subseteq \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} A_n$ with $A_n \in \mathcal{A}$, given that the elements of $\mathcal{A}$ form an algebra we can assume that $A_n \subseteq A$ for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$ and that $A_n$ are pairwise disjoint."

My notes don't state it explicitly but my understanding of how to show $\mu^*(A) \geq \mu(A)$ is to argue that for any $\epsilon \geq 0$ there is a covering of $A$ where $A \subseteq \cup_n A_n$ and $\sum_n \mu(A_n) \leq \mu^*(A) + \epsilon$. We'd then use the countability property of $\mu$ on $\mathcal{A}$ to conclude that $\mu(A) = \sum_n \mu(A_n)$, but this is predicated on $\{A_n\}$ being a partition of $A$. This is the part I'm confused about, I don't understand why we can assume that the specific covering is a partition of $A$. More specifically, as stated above, why $A_n \subseteq A$ for all $n$.

Any clarification would be greatly appreciated, thanks.