In Simple Harmonic Motion, the Amplitude is defined as the maximum displacement. Consider a pendulum (SHM) or a mass on a horizontal or vertical spiring. If the amplitude increases, which means that the height or starting distance becomes greater, the frequency AND period both do not change. I am looking for an algebraic proof that can show how the amplitude doesn't actually affect the period.
Algebraic Proof that the Amplitude does not affect Frequency
58 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail AtThere are 2 best solutions below
On
For the mass-spring system, the equation of motion reads:
$$ \begin{aligned} 0 &=m\ddot{x}+kx\\ &=\left(D_{t}-j\omega_{n}\right)\left(D_{t}+j\omega_{n}\right)x \end{aligned} $$
where $D_{t}$ is the time differential operator and $\omega_{n}=\sqrt{k/m}$. Simplifying the procedure a little here, we have either
$$ \begin{aligned} 0 &= \left(D_{t}-j\omega_{n}\right)x \implies x=C_{1}\cdot e^{j\omega_{n}t} \\\\ &\text{or} \\\\ 0 &= \left(D_{t}+j\omega_{n}\right)x \implies x=C_{2}\cdot e^{-j\omega_{n}t} \end{aligned} $$
Combining the two homogenous solutions:
$$ x=C_{1}\cdot e^{j\omega_{n}t} + C_{2}\cdot e^{-j\omega_{n}t} $$
The thing to notice here is that any constants $C_{1}$ and $C_{2}$ satisfy the equation of motion, their values only depend on the initial conditions and are independent of the frequency $\omega_{n}$.
As CyclotomicField proposed in the comments, if you model your wave as a function $f(t)$ a change of amplitude corresponds to the re-scaling by a positive number $a$. This rescaling doesn't affect the zeroes of the function at all, so the distances between the zeroes, i.e. the period, doesn't change either.