An abelian $p$-group has finitely many elements of each order iff it satisfies ${\rm min}$

230 Views Asked by At

This is part of Exercise 4.3.5 of Robinson's "A Course in the Theory of Groups (Second Edition)". According to Approach0 and this search, it is new to MSE.

(NB: I have left out the tag for a reason: the tools available here are entirely group theoretic.)

The Details:

A group $G$ satisfies ${\rm min}$ if every set $S$ of subgroups of $G$ has at least one minimal element (with respect to $H\le K$ for $H,K\in S$).

A group $G$ is a $p$-group, for prime $p$, if each element of $G$ has order a power of $p$.

Let $n\in\Bbb N$. Then $G[n]$ is the subgroup of a group $G$ of all elements $g\in G$ such that $ng=0$.

The Question:

An abelian $p$-group has finitely many elements of each order if and only if it satisfies ${\rm min}$.

Thoughts:

Let $p$ be prime. Suppose $G$ is an abelian $p$-group.


$(\Leftarrow)$

Suppose $G$ satisfies ${\rm min}$. Suppose, further, that $G$ has infinitely many elements of order $p^k$ for some $k\in\Bbb N$. I think it would help to consider $G[p^k]$; I'm not sure why.

I don't know where to go from here.


$(\Rightarrow)$

Suppose $G$ has finitely many elements of each order.

What do I do next?


I'm aware that it is possible to have an infinite group with finitely many elements of each order; for example, consider

$$\bigoplus_{p\text{ prime}}\Bbb Z_p.$$

The question is trivial if $G$ is finite.


This appears to be a question I could answer myself with more time. Thus hints are preferred over full solutions.


Please help :)

1

There are 1 best solutions below

12
On BEST ANSWER

Let $\Omega_i(G)$ denote the subgroup generated by all elements of order $p^i$. Recall that an elementary abelian group is simply a direct product of (possibly infinitely many) copies of the cyclic group $C_p$*. Its rank is the number of copies of $C_p$. Notice that raising to the power $p$ is a map from $\Omega_i(G)$ to $\Omega_{i-1}(G)$ for each $i$. In particular, it induces a homomorphism from the quotient groups $\Omega_{i+1}/\Omega_i(G)\to \Omega_i(G)/\Omega_{i-1}(G)$, and this homomorphism must be injective. Since all elements of this quotient have order $p$, it is an elementary abelian $p$-group, so we are interested in its rank. In particular, the rank of $\Omega_i/\Omega_{i-1}(G)$ is at most the rank of $\Omega_1(G)/\Omega_0(G)=\Omega_1(G)$. For $i\in \mathbb N$, write $r(G,i)$ for the rank of $\Omega_i(G)/\Omega_{i-1}(G)$ (which could be $\infty$), a weakly descending sequence for any fixed $G$, i.e., $r(G,i)\geq r(G,j)$ for all $i\leq j$. This applies for all subgroups of $G$ as well, and of course $r(G,i)\geq r(H,i)$ for any subgroup $H$ of $G$.

Thus if there are infinitely many elements of order $p^i$ for some $i$ then there are infinitely many of order $p$. These look like an infinite-dimensional $\mathbb{F}_p$-vector space. Take the set of all infinite subgroups of $\Omega_1(G)$. Certainly there are infinitely many of them, and they cannot have a minimal element, just by removing one basis element at a time. Thus $G$ cannot have min.

Conversely, let $$H_1>H_2>H_3>\cdots$$ be an infinite descending chain of subgroups of $G$, but that $G$ has only finitely many elements of order $p$ (and hence of order $p^i$ for all $i$). For each $i$, let $f(i)$ denote the smallest order of an element of $H_i\setminus H_{i+1}$, which exists since all elements of $G$ have finite order. Notice that $f:\mathbb N\to\mathbb N$ cannot take the same value $m$ infinitely often, as then there would be infinitely many elements of order $p^m$ in $G$.

Note that $r(H_i,j)\geq r(H_{i+i},j)$ for all $i$ and $j$. If $f(1)=m_1$, then we see that $r(H_1,m_1)>r(H_2,m_1)$, which means that the latter is strictly less than $r$, and indeed therefore $r(H_i,m)<r$ for all $i\geq 2$ and $m\geq m_1$. We will now repeat the process, but we have to be a little careful.

Since the sequence $f(i)$ diverges, we can produce a weakly increasing subsequence, with indices $i_1,i_2,\dots$, and values $m_j=f(i_j)$. We have $$ r\geq r(H_{i_1},m_1)>r(H_{i_1+1},m_1)\geq r(H_{i_2},m_2)>r(H_{i_2+1},m_2)\geq r(H_{i_3},m_3)>\cdots.$$ Such a sequence cannot have more than $r$ strict inequalities, and so we obtain a contradiction.

*Here direct product means direct sum in the categorical sense, sometimes a restricted direct product. How about: this is an abelian group all of whose elements have order $p$.