An exercise in my textbook asked to prove the following inequality, valid for all $a,b,c,d \in R $
$$\left(\frac{a}{2} + \frac{b}{3} + \frac{c}{12} + \frac{d}{12}\right)^4 \leq \frac{a^4}{2} + \frac{b^4}{3} + \frac{c^4}{12} + \frac{d^4}{12}$$
There is a straightforward proof using Convex Functions:
- $f(x) = x^4$ is a convex function satisfying $f(\lambda x + (1-\lambda) y) \leq \lambda f(x) + (1 - \lambda)f(y)$ for all $x,y \in R$ and $\lambda \in [0,1]$
- Since $\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{12} + \frac{1}{12} = 1$, we can use the convexity property to obtain the inequality.
Since this question was on the chapter about Convex Functions, I was able to find the solution quickly. However, had I seen the problem in a "standalone" manner I would probably take longer to solve it, and at least spend a lot of muscle opening up the left hand term :)
My question is: What would be other ways to obtain this same result? What if someone had shown me this problem back when I was in eight grade?
It all begins with the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality which says that the average of the squares is bigger than the square of the average: $$\left({x+y\over 2}\right)^2\leq {x^2+y^2\over 2}.$$ We see this is true since subtracting the left from the right hand expression gives $(x-y)^2/4\geq 0$.
Next, we extend this result to collections larger than two:
$$\left({x_1+x_2+\cdots +x_n\over n}\right)^2\leq {x_1^2+x_2^2+\cdots+x_n^2\over n}.$$ You can prove this by induction on $n$, or directly by subtracting the left from the right hand expression to get the obviously non-negative $\sum_{i<j} (x_i-x_j)^2/n^2$.
Now, applying this inequality twice, once to the numbers $x_j$ and then to the numbers $x_j^2$, gives the fourth power version: $$\left({x_1+x_2+\cdots+x_n\over n}\right)^4\leq \left({x_1^2+x_2^2+\cdots+x_n^2\over n}\right)^2 \leq {x_1^4+x_2^4+\cdots+x_n^4\over n}. $$
Finally, as mentioned by Carl, putting $n=12$ and choosing $x_j=a$ for $j=1,2,3,4,5,6$, $x_j=b$ for $j=7,8,9,10$, $x_{11}=c$, and $x_{12}=d$ then plugging into the formula above gives your result.
I don't know how well this would go over in a grade 8 classroom, but it doesn't use any advanced mathematics.