An unusual method for multivariable extrema

73 Views Asked by At

I'm going over some problems from my textbook and the problem states simply states to find the extrema for the function $$f(x, y)=x^2y^3(6-x-y)$$

I'll skip over the initial part because it's simple enough and I do understand it, the partial derivatives are: $$f^{'}_{x} = xy^3(-3x+2y+12)$$ $$f^{'}_{y} = x^2y^2(-3x-4y+18)$$ Solving the system gives us one critical point $(2, 3)$ and two families of critical points $M_t(0, t)$ and $N_t(t, 0)$ for any $t \in \mathbb{R}$. The second partial derivative test will work for the point $(2, 3)$ showing that it is a local maximum. However, it won't work for the other two. So I flipped over to the solutions in the textbook and they state the following:

If we use the fact that $f(M_t) = f(N_t) = 0$ we notice that it's sufficient to check the sign of the function in the surroundings of these points. For example, if the function turns out to be positive around $M_{t_0}$ for some $t_0$ that would mean that we have a local maximum (and other way around).

Thinking about this in 2D I realized it does make sense, since the value of the point is exactly at $0$. Moving on:

The sign of the function $f(x, y) = x^2y^3(6-x-y)$ depends on the sign of the expression $6-x-y$. Now it's clear that for $t>6$ and $t<0$ $M_t$ are points of local maxima, where for $0<t<6$ they're the points of local minima. For $t = 0$ and $t = 6$ there are no extrema since for no matter how small surrounding of these points f takes both positive and negative values. We similarly prove that no point from the $N_t$ family is an extremum.

The very first sentence is confusing already. Doesn't the sign of the function also depend on the $x^2y^3$ term (well really only on $y^3$ term but still)? Everything after that is even more confusing (what they say 'it's clear from here' doesn't seem to be clear to me at all).

So does anyone have a better/more detailed explanation?

Thanks.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

The rule must be:

For example, if the function turns out to be positive around $M_{t_0}$ for some $t_0$ that would mean that we have a local $\color{red}{minimum}$ (and other way around).

The sign of the function does depend on $y^3$.

Indeed, given $f(x, y) = x^2y^3(6-x-y)$, at around $(0,t)$: $$t>6 \Rightarrow t=6+\delta, 0<\delta<\infty\Rightarrow \\ f(0\pm\epsilon,(6+\delta)\pm \sigma)\stackrel{\delta>\sigma}=\underbrace{(0\pm\epsilon)^2}_{>0}\underbrace{((6+\delta)\pm \sigma)^3}_{>0}\underbrace{(6-(0\pm \epsilon)-((6+\delta)\pm \sigma))}_{<0}<0 \Rightarrow \\ f(0,t>6) \ \text{are the points of local maxima.}\\ t<0\Rightarrow t=0-\delta\Rightarrow \\ f(0\pm\epsilon,(0-\delta)\pm \sigma)\stackrel{\delta>\sigma}=\underbrace{(0\pm\epsilon)^2}_{>0}\underbrace{((0-\delta)\pm \sigma)^3}_{<0}\underbrace{(6-(0\pm \epsilon)-((0-\delta)\pm \sigma))}_{>0}<0 \Rightarrow \\ f(0,t<0) \ \text{are the points of local maxima.}\\ 0<t<6\Rightarrow t=0+\delta=6-\phi\Rightarrow \\ f(0\pm\epsilon,(0+\delta \ \text{or} \ 6-\phi)\pm \sigma)\stackrel{\delta>\sigma \ \text{or} \ \phi>\delta}=\\ =\underbrace{(0\pm\epsilon)^2}_{>0}\underbrace{((0+\delta \ \text{or} \ 6-\phi)\pm \sigma)^3}_{>0}\underbrace{(6-(0\pm \epsilon)-((0+\delta \ \text{or} \ 6-\phi)\pm \sigma))}_{>0}>0 \Rightarrow \\ f(0,0<t<6) \ \text{are the points of local minima.}$$