An upper bound of the first eigenvalue of Laplacian on a Riemannian manifold.

187 Views Asked by At

I'm reading the Cheng's thesis ""Eigenvalue Comparison Theorems and Its Geometric Applications," and the author obtains an estimate of eigenvalues of the Laplacian based upon his theorem:

If $M$ is $n$-dimensional compact Riemannian manifold with Ricci curvature $\geq(n-1)k$, then $$\mu_m(M)\leq\lambda_1(V_n(k,\frac{d_M}{2m}))$$ where $d_M$ denotes the diameter of $M$.

Geometric meaning of comparing eigenvalues is what I am trying to learn these days, but I have a trouble in understanding how certain estimates come in (and also others here and there).

Let's assume the case Ricci curvature $\geq(n-1)(-k),\ k>0$, $V_n(k,r_0)$ denote the ball of radius $r_0$ in the space form of dimension $n$ with constant curvature $k$.

What I could understand: The first eigenfunction of $V_{n}(-1,r_0)$ is radial and satisfies the differential equation $$\frac{d^2\varphi}{dr^2}+(n-1)\coth (r)\frac{d\varphi}{dr}+\lambda\varphi=0.$$ $$\frac{d\varphi}{dr}(0)=\varphi(r_0)=0.$$ Performing a substitution $$s=\cosh(r)=\mathrm{ch}(r),$$ it transforms into $$(s^2-1)\frac{d^2\varphi}{ds^2}+ns\frac{d\varphi}{ds}+\lambda\varphi=0,\ s\geq 1.$$ In case of $n=2$, the eigenfunctions are the well-known Legendre functions $P_{-\frac{1}{2}+ip},\ p\in\mathbb{R}$ with $\lambda=\frac{1}{4}+p^2$. Requiring that $$\frac{d\varphi}{ds}(0)=\varphi(s_0)=0.$$ qualifies $p$ for only discrete values, and it is known that there is a zero within each interval $(\mathrm{ch}\frac{l\pi}{p}, \mathrm{ch}\frac{(l+1)\pi}{p})$, $l$ a positive integer. Using this information, we have $s_0=\mathrm{ch}(r_0)\leq\mathrm{ch}\frac{2\pi}{p}$, and thus, $$\lambda_1(V_2(-1,r_0))=\frac{1}{4}+p^2\leq\frac{1}{4}+\left (\frac{2\pi}{r_0}\right )^2.$$ Since its derivatives $\frac{d^m}{ds^m}(P_{-\frac{1}{2}+ip})$ satisfies $$(s^2-1)\frac{d^2\varphi}{ds^2}+2(m+1)s\frac{d\varphi}{ds}+\left ( \frac{(2m+1)^2}{4}+p^2\right )\varphi=0.$$ (It is another part that I don't understand, is it a well known fact?)

Similarly, within each interval $\left (\mathrm{ch}(\frac{l\pi}{p}),\mathrm{ch}(\frac{(l+2^m)\pi}{p})\right )$ there is a zero of $\frac{d^m}{ds^m}(P_{-\frac{1}{2}+ip})$, therefore, $$\lambda_1(V_{2(m+1)}(-1,r_0))\leq\frac{(2m+1)^2}{4}+\frac{(1+2^m)^2\pi^2}{r_0^2},\ m=0,1,2,\cdots.$$

What I couldn't understand:

For the case of odd dimension, let $\varphi$ be a function satisfying $$(s^2-1)\frac{d^2\varphi}{ds^2}+2(m+1)s\frac{d\varphi}{ds}+\left ( \frac{(2m+1)^2}{4}+p^2\right )\varphi=0.$$ Then $\psi=(s^2-1)^(-\frac{1}{4})\varphi$ satisfies $$(s^2-1)\frac{d^2\psi}{ds^2}+(2m+3)s\frac{d\psi}{ds}+\left ( \frac{(2m+2)^2}{4}+p^2+\frac{4m+1}{4}(s^2-1)^{-1}\right )\psi=0.$$ It is all good so far, but the next estimate suddenly came out: $$\lambda_1(V_{2m+3}(-1,r_0))\leq\frac{(2m+2)^2}{4}+\frac{(1+2^{2m})^2\pi^2}{r_0^2}+\frac{1}{\sinh(\frac{r_0}{1+2^{2m}})^2}.$$ This is the part that I would like to ask a question.

Some facts that may be needed are the following:

  • We are dealing with functions on the interval $[1,s_0]$, where $s_0=\mathrm{ch}(r_0)$, so we can assume $s\leq s_0$.

  • The identity $\sinh(x)^2=\cosh(x)^2-1.$

  • The Legendre differential equation is $$(1-x^2)\frac{d^2y}{dx^2}-2x\frac{dy}{dx}+l(l+1)y=0,$$ here $l$ equals to the value $-\frac{1}{2}+ip.$

  • The associated Legendre differential equation is $$(1-x^2)\frac{d^2y}{dx^2}-2x\frac{dy}{dx}+\left (l(l+1)-\frac{c^2}{1-x^2}\right )y=0.$$

The last fact looks helpful, but two things do not agree with the above situation. One is that the coefficient in the second term is $2x$, not $(2m+3)x$. Also, the coefficient in the third term is $\frac{1}{4}+p^2+\frac{1}{4}\frac{1}{s^2-1}$, not $\frac{(2m+2)^2}{4}+p^2+\frac{4m+1}{4}(s^2-1)^{-1}$. Well, even if I overcome this by differentiating the solution of the case $m=0$ mimicking as above, the other reamains, that is, I do not see what an eigenvalue is in the associated Legendre differential equation.

I overall felt that the author uses basic facts regarding Legendre functions without much explanations, so leaving references would really help me.

Thanks for reading it.