I was thinking about how to prove that $\mathbb{CP}^n$ is a real manifold. I have never studied complex geometry, but I would cover $\mathbb{CP}^n$ with the charts given by $U_i=\{[z_0,...,z_n]|z_i\neq 0\}$ and $\phi_i: [z_0,...,z_n]\in U_i\mapsto\frac{1}{z_i}(z_0,...,z_{i-1},z_{i+1},...,z_n)\in \mathbb{C}^n$ then I would go to $\mathbb{R}^{2n}$ by $(z_o,...,z_n)\mapsto(x_o,y_o,...,x_n,y_n)$ where $z_i=x_i+iy_i$. But is the whole thing $C^\infty$? How to prove it explicitely? Does this work in general?
2026-03-31 12:17:24.1774959444
Any complex manifold of dimension $n$ is a real manifold of dimension $2n$
187 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in MANIFOLDS
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Possible condition on locally Euclidean subsets of Euclidean space to be embedded submanifold
- Using the calculus of one forms prove this identity
- "Defining a smooth structure on a topological manifold with boundary"
- On the differentiable manifold definition given by Serge Lang
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- Integration of one-form
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-TOPOLOGY
- Getting a self-homeomorphism of the cylinder from a self-homeomorphism of the circle
- what is Sierpiński topology?
- Bott and Tu exercise 6.5 - Reducing the structure group of a vector bundle to $O(n)$
- The regularity of intersection of a minimal surface and a surface of positive mean curvature?
- What's the regularity of the level set of a ''semi-nondegenerate" smooth function on closed manifold?
- Help me to prove related path component and open ball
- Poincarè duals in complex projective space and homotopy
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
- Prove that the sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$ which are both open and closed are $\emptyset$ and $\mathbb{R}^n$
Related Questions in COMPLEX-GEOMETRY
- Numerable basis of holomporphic functions on a Torus
- Relation between Fubini-Study metric and curvature
- Hausdorff Distance Between Projective Varieties
- What can the disk conformally cover?
- Some questions on the tangent bundle of manifolds
- Inequivalent holomorphic atlases
- Reason for Graphing Complex Numbers
- Why is the quintic in $\mathbb{CP}^4$ simply connected?
- Kaehler Potential Convexity
- I want the pullback of a non-closed 1-form to be closed. Is that possible?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
One just needs to construct the relevant transition maps and check that all partial derivatives exist.
Fix $0 \leq i < j \leq n$. As complex functions on $\phi_j(U_i \cap U_j) \subset \mathbb{C}^n$, we have the transition maps $\phi_i \circ \phi_j^{-1}$ given by $$\phi_i \circ \phi_j^{-1}((z_0,...,z_{j-1},z_{j+1},...,z_n)) = \phi_i([z_0,...,z_{j-1},1,z_{j+1},...,z_n]) = \frac{1}{z_i}(z_0,...,z_{i-1},z_{i+1},...,z_{j-1},1,z_{j+1},...,z_n) = \frac{\bar{z_i}}{|z_i|^2}( z_0,...,z_{i-1},z_{i+1},...,z_{j-1},1,z_{j+1},...,z_n)$$
Using your identification of $\mathbb{C}^n$ with $\mathbb{R}^{2n}$ and noting $\bar{z_i}z_k = (x_i x_k + y_i y_k)+(x_i y_k - y_i x_k)i$, we can interpret this transition function as a map $V_{ij} \subset \mathbb{R}^{2n} \to \mathbb{R}^{2n}$ (for the appropriate open set $V_{ij}$-- what should it be?) with component functions of the forms
$$(x_0,y_0,...,x_{j-1},y_{j-1},x_{j+1},y_{j+1},...x_n,y_n) \mapsto \frac{x_i x_k + y_i y_k}{x_i^2+y_i^2} \text{ or } \frac{x_i y_k - y_i x_k}{x_i^2+y_i^2}. $$ Here, $k \in \{0,...,i-1,i+1,...,n\}$ and we define $x_j:=1, \, y_j:=0$ (notice there is no input $z_j$, so we are free to do this). It is simple to observe that these expressions are smooth with respect to the $2n$ inputs.
More generally, since the transition maps $\phi_i \circ \phi_j^{-1}$ are required to be holomorphic as maps $\mathbb{C}^n \to \mathbb{C}^n$ (again, for appropriate restrictions of the domain), in particular their coordinate functions are holomorphic with respect to each complex coordinate (i.e. when we fix all but one $z_i$), and this implies that each of these are smooth as maps $\mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R}^2$ (since, for example, the real and imaginary parts of a holomorphic function are harmonic). That is to say, as maps $\mathbb{R}^{2n} \to \mathbb{R}^{2n}$, all partial derivatives of each coordinate function exists, i.e. they are smooth. So yes, this works in general.