Consider the following linear integral solved by the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus: $$\int_{a_1}^{a_2}dx\, e^{ixk}=\int_{a_1}^{a_2}dx\, \frac{d}{dx}\left(\frac{e^{ixk}}{ik}\right)= \frac{e^{ixk}}{ik}\Biggr\rvert_{a_1}^{a_2}=\frac{e^{ia_2 k}- e^{i a_1 k}}{ik}\,.$$ Is there a way to make use of a generalization of this theorem in $n$ dimensions (maybe the Gradient Theorem, or Divergence Theorem, or Stokes' theorem?) such that the multidimensional integral defined over a $n$-dimensional generic volume $V$ $$\int_{V}d\mathbf{x}\, e^{i\mathbf{x}\cdot \mathbf{k}}$$ is solved in terms of the integrand function evalutated at the $(n-1)$-dimensional boundary surface $\partial V$ of the volume $V$: $$\int_{V}d\mathbf{x}\, e^{i\mathbf{x}\cdot \mathbf{k}}=\int_V d\mathbf{x}\, \nabla_{\mathbf{x}}(e^{i\mathbf{x}\cdot \mathbf{k}})\cdot \frac{\mathbf{k}}{i k^2} \propto e^{i\mathbf{x}\cdot \mathbf{k}}\rvert_{\mathbf{x}\in \partial V}\, ?$$ Indeed in the linear example above, the integral solution is expressed in terms of the exponential function appearing in the argument, evaluated at the two points corresponding to the borders $x=a_1, a_2$ of the linear domain $[a_1,a_2]$.
2026-02-24 00:16:07.1771892167
Application of the fundamental theorem of calculus in $n$ dimensions: Stokes', divergence or gradient theorem?
410 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CALCULUS
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- How can I prove that $\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{\ln(1+\cos(\alpha)\cos(x))}{\cos(x)}dx=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\pi^2}{4}-\alpha^2\right)$?
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- If $f ◦f$ is differentiable, then $f ◦f ◦f$ is differentiable
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Number of roots of the e
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- How to prove $\frac 10 \notin \mathbb R $
- Proving that: $||x|^{s/2}-|y|^{s/2}|\le 2|x-y|^{s/2}$
Related Questions in MULTIVARIABLE-CALCULUS
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- $\iint_{S} F.\eta dA$ where $F = [3x^2 , y^2 , 0]$ and $S : r(u,v) = [u,v,2u+3v]$
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- optimization with strict inequality of variables
- How to find the unit tangent vector of a curve in R^3
- Prove all tangent plane to the cone $x^2+y^2=z^2$ goes through the origin
- Holding intermediate variables constant in partial derivative chain rule
- Find the directional derivative in the point $p$ in the direction $\vec{pp'}$
- Check if $\phi$ is convex
- Define in which points function is continuous
Related Questions in DEFINITE-INTEGRALS
- How can I prove that $\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{\ln(1+\cos(\alpha)\cos(x))}{\cos(x)}dx=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\pi^2}{4}-\alpha^2\right)$?
- Closed form of integration
- Integral of ratio of polynomial
- An inequality involving $\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\sqrt{\sin x}\:dx $
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Roots of the quadratic eqn
- Area between curves finding pressure
- Hint required : Why is the integral $\int_0^x \frac{\sin(t)}{1+t}\mathrm{d}t$ positive?
- A definite integral of a rational function: How can this be transformed from trivial to obvious by a change in viewpoint?
- Integrate exponential over shifted square root
Related Questions in STOKES-THEOREM
- Stoke's Theorem on cylinder-plane intersection.
- Integration of one-form
- First part Spivak's proof of Stokes' theorem
- Stokes theorem, how to parametrize in the right direction?
- Surface to choose for the Stokes' theorem for intersection of sphere and plane.
- What is wrong with this vector integral?
- Circulation of a vector field through a cylinder inside a sphere.
- Stokes Theorem Equivalence
- Verify Stokes Theorem vector field $\vec{F} = (y, −x, xyz)$
- Evaluate $\iint \text{curl} (y\,\mathbf{i}+2\,\mathbf{j})\cdot n\; d\sigma$ using Stokes Theorem
Related Questions in DIVERGENCE-THEOREM
- Use the divergent theorem to verify the volume of a circular cone
- Confusion regrading Stokes' and Gauss Divergence Theorem while evaluating $\iint(\nabla \times F)\cdot dS$
- An inconsistency between flux through surface and the divergence theorem
- Find the following surface integral.
- Divergence Theorem: evaluate $\iint_S F \cdot dS$
- Measure of the unit ball in $\mathbb{R}^n$
- Using the Divergence Theorem on the surface of a unit sphere
- Calculating flux from an inwards orientation
- Why is the divergence of this vector field 0? And why can't I prove it using the divergence theorem?
- Gauss divergence theorem proof problem.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
What you want is known as the (Generalized) Stokes Theorem. It is stated in the language of differential forms.
A good introductory treatment can be found in Spivak's little book Calculus on Manifolds.
Very briefly, the integrands of classical vector calculus in 3-space, such as $dA \cdot \vec n$ for surface integrals or $dV$ for volume integrals, generalize to differential 2-forms and 3-forms respectively, and then to differential $k$-forms for any dimension $k \ge 1$. When you integrate over a "$k$-dimensional generic volume" as you put it, or over a "$k$-dimensional oriented manifold" in the new language, the thing that you integrate is a differential $k$-form. The differential operators of classical vector calculus, i.e. div, grad, curl and all that, generalize to an operator called the exterior derivative, or sometimes just the "differential", denoted $d$, which (for $k \ge 0$) inputs a differential $k$-form $\omega$ and outputs a differential $k+1$ form denoted $d\omega$.
Once all those prerequisites are developed (which takes most of Spivak's book), the generalized Stokes theorem then has a very simple formulation: $$\int_M d \, \omega = \int_{\partial M} \omega $$ where $M$ is a compact, oriented, $k$-dimensional manifold, $\partial M$ is its boundary which is a compact, oriented $k-1$-dimensional manifold, and $\omega$ is a $k-1$ form.