I'm working through a Differential Geometry text. The author makes a statement I'm having a hard time understanding the validity of.
He defines a curve in $\mathbb{R}^3$ as a diffentiable function $\alpha: I \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^3$ from an open interval $I$ into $\mathbb{R}^3$.
Then he says "since a curve $\alpha: I \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^3$ is a function, it makes sense to say that $\alpha$ is one-to-one."
I'm struggling to see why this is the case...are self-intersecting curves non-differentiable and therefore ruled out? Or am I just over-thinking this? Under-thinking?
It probably just means that it is a property the function might have, or might not have, but at least the curve, being a function, lies in the category of things for which it could make sense to determine one way or the other whether they're injective. It is to make sure you have clear that it is a function, as opposed to a set of points.
If $n$ is a natural number, it makes sense to say that $n$ is odd, but if $n=16$, it is also false to say it. It is not like saying $\pi$ is odd which is just nonsense instead of wrong. Likewise, you can say a curve is injective (or not), but for the set of points traced out by the curve (i.e. the range) it would not make sense to say it is injective.
Added: From a preview in Google Books I got more context. Right after that, in the same paragraph, it says "Another special property of curves is periodicity...". This reinforces that it is just pointing out special properties a curve might or might not have.