Are mathematical operations axioms?
I will give an example of multiplication, but this also applies to division, subtraction and addition. Idea of multiplication was invented by people to increase/decrease something exactly N times. For example: I want to increase the number 3 three times, the answer of course is 9, but what is the confirmation of this?
Logically, I understand that if I want to increase something three times, it must be three times larger than original, and this is an axiom or it is just an abstract operation to get a product that must be exactly N times larger? What proof that the answer should be exactly this, pure logic? I don't ask about axioms of properties like associative, commutative...
I am not an expert in mathematics, my level of knowledge is high school.
Thank for you answer.
There are two different ways to discuss binary operations like addition and multiplication. The first is as a function from $f:(X,X)\rightarrow X$ so for example if $X=\mathbb{N}$ then $f(n,m)= n+m$. Binary operations are defined along these lines and you can construct them rather than axiomize them.
That being said, in higher algebra it's typical to treat binary operations with certain properties as axioms. For example in the definition of a group $G$ we can express closure as the property that for a binary operation $*$ then if $g*h \in G$ we say the binary operation is closed which is a subtle and powerful property. Addition and multiplication in the rational numbers are a simple example of this.
We might also want to impose further conditions like there exists an identity element $e$ such that for all $g \in G$ then $e*g=g*e=g$. If the binary operation is addition then $e$ would be $0$.
Perhaps the most powerful property a binary operation can have is associativity, that is $(g*h)*j=g*(h*j)$ which should also be familiar from addition and multiplication. In fact, because associativity fails for subtraction we just get rid of it and add negatives. That for all $g$ there exists a $g^{-1}$ such that $g^{-1}*g=e$ so a simple example for addition would be $4 + (-4)=0$. We just add negatives to avoid subtracting because then we can always use associativity. It's similar with division and multiplication, we just don't divide we assume all the reciprocals exist.
So we start with some definitions and decorate them with axioms to derive results. Most mathematical objects will come this way, with some underlying set and then a bunch of assumptions about what you can do with that set. We've packed a lot of detail into the statement "$G$ is a group" and it becomes useful to keep the detail hidden and just assume that $G$ is a group once the material is understood.