I have a curious question.
I have two images.
Picture 1:
And picture 2:
If I create the eigenvectors of each image by using MATLAB code. Here I'm using Singular Value Decomposition.
>> pic2 = rgb2gray(imread('pic2.bmp'));
>> pic1 = rgb2gray(imread('pic1.bmp'));
>> [U2, E2, V2] = svd(double(pic2));
>> [U1, E1, V1] = svd(double(pic1));
Then I plot them using scatter plot
>> scatter(U1(:, 1), U1(:, 2))
>> hold on
>> scatter(U2(:, 1), U2(:, 2))
>> grid on
>> legend('Pic1', 'Pic2')
It's seems to be no difference at all. 100% the same.
Question:
Does that mean that eigenvectors remains exactly the same, no mather of the location of the image? So if the red dot would be in a different location, the eigenvectors will still be the same as long the shape is the same? That also means I cannot compute the location of the red dot, if the eigenvectors are the same?



You've asked about the eigenvectors but you've computed the SVD; these are not the same thing! The SVD is invariant under permuting either rows or columns, while this is quite false for the eigendecomposition. That's why it has this behavior: you can get from one image to the other by permuting some rows, then permuting some columns.