I want to know which of these are connected and which are not. I think I've to take some continuous map from the set of matrices to $\mathbb R$ or $\mathbb C$ and interpret these matrix sets as inverse images of connected sets to conclude they are connected. What maps do I take? I don't think the determinant map works everywhere, if at all. Can anyone provide a solution?
2026-03-31 15:09:23.1774969763
Are the spaces of real orthogonal, complex unitary, hermitian or symmetric matrices connected?
615 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in CONNECTEDNESS
- Estimation of connected components
- decomposing a graph in connected components
- Proving that we can divide a graph to two graphs which induced subgraph is connected on vertices of each one
- Does every connected topological space have the property that you can walk around a finite open cover to get from any point to any other?
- A set with more than $n$ components has $n+1$ pairwise separated subsets.
- Can connectedness preservation be used to define continuity of a function?
- Prove the set is not connected
- Related the property of two points contained in the same component
- Is a connected component a group?
- f is a continuous function from (X,$\tau$) to {0,1} with discrete topology, if f non constant then (X,$\tau$) disconnected
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
A continuous map is indeed helpful in proving a set is disconnected. In fact, consider the determinant over the real orthogonal matrices. What is the image of this map? What can you conclude as a result?
Note that any path connected space is connected. For the symmetric and Hermitian matrices, consider $p:[0,1] \to \Bbb C^{n \times n}$ given by $$ t \mapsto (1-t)A + tB $$
All that's left now is the set of complex unitary matrices. This set is also path connected, but there is a trickier path here. Perhaps you can make sense of the map $$ t \mapsto A^{(1-t)}B^t $$ Alternatively, note that $$ A \mapsto e^{iA} $$ is a continuous onto map from the Hermitian matrices to the complex unitary matrices.
The matrix exponential is probably the quicker way to go here. We define the exponential map by $$ \exp(X) = e^X = I + X + \frac 1{2!} X^2 + \frac 1{3!} X^3 + \cdots $$ We have the following properties: $$ \exp \pmatrix{d_1\\&\ddots \\ && d_n} = \pmatrix{e^{d_1} \\ & \ddots \\ && e^{d_n}} $$ and for any invertible $S$ and matrix $A$, we have $$ \exp(SAS^{-1}) = S \exp(A) S^{-1} $$ Now, using the spectral theorem, show that if $A$ is Hermitian, then $\exp(iA)$ is unitary.