The marriage of algebraic geometry and number theory was celebrated in the twentieth century by the school of Grothendieck. As a consequence, number theory has been completely transformed.
On the other hand, the school of Alain Connes developped a theory to include the study of non-commutative rings in algebraic geometry.
As far as I understand, the tree branched off in these two separate directions, with number theory staying mostly on the commutative side of things, for the natural reason that the rings one encounters in number theory are mostly commutative.
I'd like to know if the development of noncommutative geometry has had an impact on number theory. Has it led to concrete advancements? Has it influenced the way people think about some topics? Should I, as an aspiring number theorist, care about noncommutative geometry?
Some of the main people of non-commutative geometry seemed at one time to be working on the field with one element. I cannot be sure about the details of said story, whether there is some connection beyond this coincidence, etc.. But it is something.
Fundamentally, the application of algebraic geometry to number theory consists of solving diophantine equations. These are ``commutative'' equations, by default. Can you imagine a noncommutative diophantine equation to make sense so easily? So if noncommutative geometry is applied into number theory, this simplistic/naive way of thinking may not apply. Maybe things like field with one element are deeper stuff, with some hopes in far future to merge NT and NCG.
There seems to be some potential links in other ways too; but my understanding is a bit hazy and I am not sure enough about those stuff to put it in writing definitively here. Maybe other better experts will come forward.