The 4 dimensional spacetime manifold is a typical example of pseudo-Riemannian manifold. Are there other mathematically or physically interesting example of it?
2026-03-25 00:07:39.1774397259
Are there interesting example of pseudo-Riemannian manifold other than spacetime manifold?
319 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in SOFT-QUESTION
- Reciprocal-totient function, in term of the totient function?
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- Does approximation usually exclude equality?
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Online resources for networking and creating new mathematical collaborations
- Random variables in integrals, how to analyze?
- Could anyone give an **example** that a problem that can be solved by creating a new group?
- How do you prevent being lead astray when you're working on a problem that takes months/years?
- Is it impossible to grasp Multivariable Calculus with poor prerequisite from Single variable calculus?
- A definite integral of a rational function: How can this be transformed from trivial to obvious by a change in viewpoint?
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Related Questions in PHYSICS
- Why is the derivative of a vector in polar form the cross product?
- What is meant by input and output bases?
- Does Planck length contradict math?
- Computing relative error with ideal gas law.
- Planetary orbits in a $4$-dimensional universe
- Applied Maths: Equations of Motion
- Return probability random walk
- What will be the velocity of a photon ejected from the surface of cesium by a photon with a frequency of 6.12E14 s^-1?
- What mathematical principal allows this rearrangement during simplifying
- Time when velocity of object is zero and position at that point in time
Related Questions in MOTIVATION
- How does one introduce characteristic classes
- What is the motivation of the identity $x\circ(a\circ b)=(((x\circ b)\circ a )\circ b$?
- Understanding the definition of the Group action.
- Why do PDE's seem so unnatural?
- What's the Intuition behind divisors?
- Why is the inner measure problematic?
- *WHY* are half-integral weight modular forms defined on congruence subgroups of level 4N?
- Why is the derivative important?
- How to introduce quadratic residues?
- Mortivation for the definition of measurable function?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
A Lie group $G$ acts on itself both by left translation (group multiplication on the left) and by right translation (group multiplication on the right). Hence, it's natural to look for Riemannian metrics that are bi-invariant, i.e., that make both left translation and right translation by a group element into isometries. However, there's a folkloric result that $G$ admits a bi-invariant Riemannian metric if and only if $G \cong H \times K$ for $H$ compact and $K$ abelian, which means, for instance, that the non-compact simple Lie group $$ SL(2,\mathbb{R}) := \{A \in M_2(\mathbb{R}) \mid \det(A) = 1\} $$ does not admit any bi-invariant Riemannian metrics. However, as we'll see below, it does admit a canonical bi-invariant pseudo-Riemannian metric of signature $(+,-,-)$.
Now, in general, if $\mathfrak{g}$ is the Lie algebra of $G$, we can define the Killing form $B : \mathfrak{g} \times \mathfrak{g} \to \mathbb{R}$ by $$ \forall X, Y \in \mathfrak{g}, \quad B(X,Y) := -\operatorname{trace}(\operatorname{ad}(X)\operatorname{ad}(Y)), $$ where $\operatorname{ad}(X) : \mathfrak{g} \to \mathfrak{g}$ is defined by $\operatorname{ad}(X)Y := [X,Y]$. The Killing form $B$ is bilinear, symmetric, and invariant under the adjoint action of $G$ on $\mathfrak{g}$, so by the identification of $\mathfrak{g}$ with left-invariant vector fields on $G$, it induces a bi-invariant possibly degenerate semi-Riemannian metric on $G$ with the same signature as $B$. If $G$ is semi-simple, then $B$ is actually non-degenerate, and hence induces a completely canonical bi-invariant pseudo-Riemannian metric; moreover, the Killing form $B$ is positive-definite (and hence yields a bi-invariant Riemannian metric) if and only if $G$ is compact. So, for instance, the compact semi-simple Lie group $$ SU(2) := \{A \in M_2(\mathbb{C}) \mid A^\ast A = I_2, \ \det(A) = 1\} $$ admits a canonical bi-invariant Riemannian metric induced by its Killing form, but the non-compact simple (and hence, semi-simple) Lie group $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$, which admits no bi-invariant Riemannian metric, nonetheless admits a canonical pseudo-Riemannian metric of signature $(+,-,-)$ induced by its Killing form.