I'm looking for resources that have drawn a comparison between the Parallel Postulate and the Axiom of Choice.
That is, if we treat ZFC as an analogue to Euclidean geometry, can we view the development of models of ZF that, for instance, exclude AC and CH, as being similar to geometries that exclude certain axioms of Euclidean geometry?
I haven't been able to locate any, but it's also a really tough idea to frame in academic journal search engines, and this is about the only result I can uncover in general searches: https://thetwomeatmeal.wordpress.com/2010/10/29/the-zermelo-fraenkel-axioms-for-sets/