Suppose that I have a bijective local isometry $f: X \rightarrow Y$ where $X$ and $Y$ are length spaces. Can I show that $f$ is a global isometry? My thought is to consider a path $\gamma$ from $x$ to $y$ in $X$ and look at a subdivision $(t_1, \ldots, t_n)$ of $\gamma$. Then map the subdivision $(t_1, \ldots t_n)$ to a subdivision of $f(\gamma)$ in $Y$. For a sufficiently fine subdivision each consecutive pair of points should be in the same chart on $Y$. Then the sum of the lengths should be the same in the two spaces so $f$ is an isometry. Can anyone help me formalize this a bit?
2026-03-25 14:19:57.1774448397
Bijective local isometry to global isometry
1.4k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in METRIC-SPACES
- Show that $d:\mathbb{C}\times\mathbb{C}\rightarrow[0,\infty[$ is a metric on $\mathbb{C}$.
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Lemma 1.8.2 - Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory
- Closure and Subsets of Normed Vector Spaces
- Is the following set open/closed/compact in the metric space?
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
- continuous surjective function from $n$-sphere to unit interval
- Show that $f$ with $f(\overline{x})=0$ is continuous for every $\overline{x}\in[0,1]$.
- Help in understanding proof of Heine-Borel Theorem from Simmons
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-TOPOLOGY
- Getting a self-homeomorphism of the cylinder from a self-homeomorphism of the circle
- what is Sierpiński topology?
- Bott and Tu exercise 6.5 - Reducing the structure group of a vector bundle to $O(n)$
- The regularity of intersection of a minimal surface and a surface of positive mean curvature?
- What's the regularity of the level set of a ''semi-nondegenerate" smooth function on closed manifold?
- Help me to prove related path component and open ball
- Poincarè duals in complex projective space and homotopy
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
- Prove that the sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$ which are both open and closed are $\emptyset$ and $\mathbb{R}^n$
Related Questions in METRIC-GEOMETRY
- Why not define lines in a metric space using a locus?
- Example of length structure with Euclidian intrinsic metric but different path lengths
- exercise about doubling
- Spaces of (complete) separable metric spaces
- Spaces of separable metric spaces II: pointed spaces
- Formalize idea of 'homeomorphism that preserves geodesics'?
- $2$-dim positively curved Alexandrov space
- Length of a curve defined by a convex function
- Approximation of four dimensional ball by three dimensional spheres
- Product of two CAT($\kappa$) spaces is CAT($\kappa$) for $\kappa \ge 0$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Your argument can be firmed up to show that $f$ preserves the lengths of curves. This in turn implies that $f$ is nonexpanding, i.e. $d'(f(x_1),f(x_2))\leq d(x_1,x_2)$. But without knowing that $f^{-1}$ is continuous, it's conceivable that there's some path in $Y$ from $f(x_1)$ to $f(x_2)$ which is not the image of a path in $X$ and has a shorter length than all such paths. That would stop $f$ from being an isometry. We can show that a bijective local isometry is a global isometry if and only if $f^{-1}$ is continuous.
By length space, I assume you mean a metric space whose induced arc-length metric agrees with the original metric (which, in particular, implies that the space is path-connected). And by local isometry, I assume you mean a map $f:(X,d) \to (Y,d')$ such that every point $x \in X$ has a neighborhood $U$ in which $d'(f(x_1),f(x_2))=d(x_1,x_2)$ for all $x_1,x_2 \in U$.
Claim 1. A local isometry between length spaces preserves the lengths of curves.
Proof. Let $\gamma:[0,1] \to X$ be a path from $x_0=\gamma(0)$ to $x_1=\gamma(1)$. Given $\epsilon>0$, we can find a subdivision $t_0<\cdots<t_n$ such that $$\sum_{i =1}^n d'(f(\gamma(t_i)),f(\gamma(t_{i+1})))<L_{d'}(f\circ \gamma)+\epsilon.$$ We can cover the image of $\gamma$ in $X$ with open sets on which $f$ is an isometry. This image is compact, so we can extract a finite subcover. It's straightforward to see that we can add terms to the subdivision $t_0<\cdots<t_n$ until each interval $[t_i,t_{i +1}]$ is mapped into one of the open sets on which $f$ is an isometry. (For example, pull back the finite cover and use the Lebesgue Number Lemma.) By adding even more terms, we ensure that $$\sum_{i =1}^n d(\gamma(t_i),\gamma(t_{i+1}))<L_{d}( \gamma)+\epsilon.$$ Now we have \begin{align*} L_d(\gamma)&< \epsilon+\sum_{i =1}^n d(\gamma(t_i),\gamma(t_{i+1}))\\ &=\epsilon+\sum_{i =1}^n d'(f(\gamma(t_i)),f(\gamma(t_{i+1})))\\ &\leq L_{d'}(f\circ \gamma)+\epsilon. \end{align*} We also have \begin{align*} L_{d}(\gamma) &>\sum_{i =1}^n d(\gamma(t_i),\gamma(t_{i +1}))-\epsilon\\ &=\sum_{i =1}^n d'(f(\gamma(t_i)),f(\gamma( t_{i +1})))-\epsilon\\ &\geq L_{d'}(f\circ \gamma)-\epsilon, \end{align*} as desired.
Claim 2. If a bijective local isometry between length spaces has a continuous inverse, then it is a global isometry.
Proof. Since $f^{-1}$ is continuous, each neighborhood $U$ on which $f$ is an isometry is carried to an open set $(f^{-1})^{-1}(U)=f(U)$. Then it is easy to see that $f^{-1}$ is an isometry on $f(U)$. It follows that $f^{-1}$ is also a local isometry, hence preserves the lengths of curves. This means $f$ respects the arc-length metric. And since the arc-length metric agrees with the original metric, we conclude that $f$ is a global isometry. $\square$