I have managed to end up in a fourth-year differential equations class without ever needing to take analysis (really think they messed the pre-reqs up). I know the notions of bounded, closed, compact, and convergent sequences, continuity and even uniform continuity. But give me a ball of radius $r$ at $x$ and all I know how to do with it is play soccer.
I would like a good book that lays out different types of continuity and proves their relationship, preferably also with examples being applied to actual functions on the reals. (Turns out there is like 6 different types of continuity. And I really don’t want to drop this class if I can help it.)
Re: Lipschitz continuity, I suggest you look at Fig. 29 in Arnold (1992) and the discussion around it. Myself, I think about the Lipschitz property as more of a weakened smoothness condition than a strengthened continuity one; the symbol $C^{1-}$ sometimes used for Lipschitz-continuous functions is quite apt. (Note that $C^0 \supset C^{1-} \supset C^1$; about the $C^k$ notation, see the MathWorld article in case you’ve never taken multivariable calculus.)
Re: other notions of continuity, I’m not sure that you are going to need them all. To enumerate:
Aside from continuity, your remarks make me wonder whether you took some kind of multivariable differential calculus. If not, study it, because it is required here. A ball there is just a normal Euclidean ball (possibly $n$-dimensional though), the excercise is mostly to figure out where in the usual calculus proofs you can change a modulus sign into a norm (i.e. length) sign, and where you should replace multiplication by a linear map (i.e. matrix multiplication). Functional (infinite-dimensional) balls should come afterwards.
Re: the course, brace yourself, because the proofs are going to be hard for you. Thankfully, there is not a lot of theorems in a basic ODE course, and the statements are all rather intuitive. Given that you are asking the question at this time of year, I suppose that the course began with the theorems, which is really not a wise choice. (However, if it is really all like this, i.e. if it is going to proceed into PDE theory, dynamical systems and so on, I strongly suggest you drop it.) Read the first chapters in Arnold’s book to get what you are actually getting at with those statements. (I would even recommend to track down a translation of the first Russian edition, because it is much more concise if sparser on applications.)