I have to prove that doesn't exist a compact $3$-manifold such that $\partial X= \mathbb{R}P^2$. My book suggests to use Euler characteristic and define $Y = X \cup_{\mathbb{R}P^2} X$. What is $X \cup_{\mathbb{R}P^2} X$ ? How can I make the proof?
2026-03-25 23:37:06.1774481826
Bordism classes of real projective plane
145 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GEOMETRY
- Point in, on or out of a circle
- Find all the triangles $ABC$ for which the perpendicular line to AB halves a line segment
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- Asymptotes of hyperbola
- Finding the range of product of two distances.
- Constrain coordinates of a point into a circle
- Position of point with respect to hyperbola
- Length of Shadow from a lamp?
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
Related Questions in COBORDISM
- Cobordisms and compactness
- Cobordism and Boundary Theorem (Guillemin-Pollack)
- Handle attachment and spin$^c$ structures
- Limitive result in constructing cobordisms for 3-manifolds
- Formal group law of complex cobordism
- Pontryagin-Thom construction references for homotopy groups of spheres
- Orientable double-cover of the Mobius strip
- Why is the $J$-homomorphism an isomorphism for $n=1$?
- Understanding Corollaries of the h-cobordism theorem
- Cobordant 1-manifolds are homologous?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The following is just a hint, not a complete answer:
Suppose you have two manifolds with boundary $M_1, M_2$ and a homeomorphism $h: \partial M_1\to \partial M_2$ of their boundaries. Then one can define a new manifold $M_1\cup_h M_2$ by taking the quotient of the disjoint union $M_1\sqcup M_2$, by the equivalence relation $x\sim h(x), x\in \partial M_1$. A special case of this construction is called the double of a manifold along its boundary, where $M_1=M_2$, $\partial M_1=N$, and $h$ is the identity map of the boundary to itself. The result of doubling is usually denoted $M_1\cup_N M_1$. (Here is is very important to use the disjoint union in the construction.) The result of the general gluing construction is a manifold $M$ without boundary. A nice exercise now is to compute (in the case of compact manifolds) $\chi(M)$ in terms of $\chi(M_1), \chi(M_2)$ and $\chi(\partial M_1)$ by first assuming that manifolds in question are triangulated. (The same answer works in general, just requires a bit more work.)
Now, in the case of $N=RP^2$, one needs to compute $\chi(RP^2)$ and use the fact that $\chi(M)=0$, as $M$ is a closed odd-dimensional manifold.