My professor defines bounded linear transformations (operators) between two norm linear spaces as "linear map that maps bounded sets to bounded sets".
But in many books has defined it as a linear map $T:X\to Y$ such that: for all $x\neq 0$ there is $M\ge 0$ with $$\dfrac{\|Tx\|_Y}{\|x\|_X}\le M.$$ However, I can not see any immediate equivalence between these two definitions.
Are these two equivalent? If it is yes, How can you see it?
Also, I would like to know the definition and the intuition behind the unbounded linear operators.
Clearly, if there is an $M > 0$ such that $\frac{\|Tx\|_Y}{\|x\|_X}\leq M$ for all $x\in X$, then $T$ maps bounded sets to bounded sets. Take $S\subset X$ such that $\|x\|_X\leq B < \infty$ for all $x\in S$. Then, for $y\in T(S)$, $y = Tx$ for some $x\in S$, which implies that $\|y\|_Y\leq M\|x\|_X\leq MB$, so $T(S)$ is bounded.
Similarly, if $T$ maps bounded sets to bounded sets, then we must have some $M\geq 0$ such that $\frac{\|Tx\|_Y}{\|x\|_X}\leq M$. Otherwise, take an increasing sequence $\{M_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$ such that $M_n\to \infty$, and for each $n$ choose an $x_n\in X$ such that $\|x_n\|_X = 1$ and $\frac{\|Tx_n\|_Y}{\|x_n\|_X} = \|Tx_n\|_Y > M_n$, which we can do by the linearity of $T$, as $$\frac{\|Tx\|_Y}{\|x\|_X} = \left\|T\frac{x}{\|x\|_X}\right\|_Y$$ is only dependent on the "direction" of $x$, not on its length. Then, $\{x_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$ is bounded as it lies within the unit sphere, but $\{Tx_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$ is not bounded.