Munkres defines the box topology as shown below. I am trying to understand how come an element of basis as defined is even subset of $\prod_{\alpha \in J}X_{\alpha}$. If we get an element of the basis, then it is $\prod_{\alpha \in J} U_{\alpha}$, where $U_{\alpha}$ is open in $X_{\alpha}$. $\prod_{\alpha \in J} U_{\alpha} = \{ f : J \rightarrow \bigcup_{\alpha \in J} U_{\alpha} : f(\alpha) \in U_{\alpha} \}$, which isn't subset of $\prod_{\alpha \in J} X_{\alpha}$ as $\bigcup_{\alpha \in J}U_{\alpha}$ isn't equal to $\bigcup_{\alpha \in J}X_{\alpha}$ in general right ? So, how come it is a subset?
2026-03-26 04:29:42.1774499382
Box topology definition
160 Views Asked by user329017 https://math.techqa.club/user/user329017/detail At
2
In general, if $A_\alpha\subseteq B_\alpha$, then $\bigcup A_\alpha\subseteq\bigcup B_\alpha$. This is an easy exercise, which I am leaving to you.
And if $f\colon X\to Y$, and $Y\subseteq W$, then $f$ is also a function from $X$ into $W$. Because functions in this context are sets of ordered pairs, not triplets of domain, codomain and "rule". And even if they are, we can replace $\subseteq$ by some relevant notion to match this definition.
Therefore every function in $\prod U_\alpha$ is in particular a function in $\prod X_\alpha$. So it is indeed a subset of the product.