Consider a game where you start with 1 point.
Then you flip a fair coin infinitely many times.
For each heads, you gain 2 points. For each tails, you lose 1 point.
What is the probability that your score never goes below 1?
edit: I am looking specifically for the answer with flipping infinitely many times, not the probability after $N$ flips as $N$ approaches infinity.
Here is a different approach. I calculated the probability of losing if you throw exactly $h$ heads, for $h=0,1,2,\dots$
A001764 enumerates (among other things) the "Number of lattice paths of $n$ East steps and $2n$ North steps from $(0,0)$ to $(n,2n)$ and lying weakly below the line $y=2x.$" If we consider an East step as heads and a North step as tails, this is just the number of losing sequences $a_n$ with exactly $n$ heads, considering that we will toss one more tails at the end.
According to A001764, $$a_n={{3n\choose n}\over 2n+1}$$ and the probability of losing is $$ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_n2^{-3n-1} $$
A July 17, 2108 comment on A001764 by Michael Somos says that $$A(1/8) = -1+\sqrt5$$ where $A(z)$ is the generating function of the $a_n$. It's easy to see that $A(1/8)$ is the probability of losing, so that the probability of winning is $${3-\sqrt5\over2}$$
Alternatively, Wolfram Alpha gives this value if one substitutes the explicit formula for $a_n$ into the sum.
I've been trying to find a simple derivation for the formula for $a_n$ based on Milo Brandt's elegant solution. If the probability of heads is $p,$ then the same argument as Milo gave shows that the probability of losing is $$-\frac12+\frac{\sqrt{4p-3p^2}}{2p}\tag{1}$$ The series is $$(1-p)\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_ny^n, \text{ where } y = p(1-p)^2$$
So far, I haven't been able to manipulate $(1)$ into a an expression in $y$ that will allow me to compute the $a_n.$
NOTE
I have removed the explanation of why I was dissatisfied with my original solution, which leave some of the comments without context. My original solution was much like Ian's but my argument wasn't complete. This points is discussed in the comments to Ian's solution, both by Ian and by Aaron Montgomery.