Assume you observe $(y_{i},x_{i})$, for $i=1...N.$ They are linearly related by: $$ y_{i}=mx_{i} $$ Now, assume we deflate both $y_{i}$ and $x_{i}$ by another variable, $c_{i},$ which varies across $i.$ Call $y_{i}/c_{i}=\tilde{y_{i}}$ and $x_{i}/c_{i}=\tilde{x}_{i}$. I ran on OLS regression and obtained, again a slope parameter of $m,$ as $$ \frac{\frac{y_{i}}{c_{i}}}{\frac{x_{i}}{c_{i}}}=\frac{y_{i}}{c_{i}}=m $$ Assume now that we have a constant term, $b$, such that: $$ y_{i}=mx_{i}+b $$ Now, when I run a regression of $\tilde{y_{i}}$ on $\tilde{x_{i}},$ I no longer get a slope of $m.$ If $c_{i}$ were a constant $c,$ then yes, I would obtain: $$ m=\frac{cy_{2}-cy_{1}}{cx_{2}-cx_{1}}=\frac{y_{2}-y_{1}}{x_{2}-x_{1}} $$ . However, given that $c_{i}$ is itself variable, I get $$ \tilde{m}=\frac{c_{2}y_{2}-c_{1}y_{1}}{c_{2}x_{2}-c_{1}x_{1}}\neq\frac{y_{2}-y_{1}}{x_{2}-x_{1}} $$ unless specific circumstances hold. Now, although I understand what is happening algebraically, what I fail to understand is why, intuitively, just the inclusion of an intercept makes all the difference. The fact that $c_{i}$ is a variable does not affect the calculation of a slope when there is no intercept, but does in the latter case. What is going on? Why is the intercept so impactful?
2026-03-29 06:00:36.1774764036
Changes in slope when deflated by a third variable
62 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in SLOPE
- Given, y=x^3 - 2x+3, Find the equation of the tangent at at x =2
- Can you resolve this contradiction concerning the geometric interpretation of differential equations?
- What is the equation for an ellipse given 3 points and the tangent line at those points?
- Find the equation to the line perpendicular to the tangent to the curve $y=x^3−4x+ 7$ at the point $(2,7)$.
- Points from point and slope?
- Prove the slope of the asymptote of a hyperbola
- Slope of a line as a row vector
- If we know the the slopes of two tangents at a certain $x$-value and a certain $y$-value, how to find quadratic function with these characteristics?
- Extremum of a function
- Estimating the slope of tangent line in $\frac{ A(2.1)-A(2) }{0.1}$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The intuitive explanation is that when the intercept is constant, the change in rise will be directly proportional to the change in run, as both data points will lie on the same line.
Once you introduce a variable factor in the constant, you are evaluating the slope where each data point lies on a separate line, which immediately alters the value of the gradient.
We can see this clearly by writing $y_i=mx_i+b$ as $\tilde y_i=m\tilde x_i+bc_i^{-1}$ on dividing by $c_i$. The gradient is now $$\frac{\tilde y_j-\tilde y_i}{\tilde x_j-\tilde x_i}=\frac{m\tilde x_j+bc_j^{-1}-(m\tilde x_i+bc_i^{-1})}{\tilde x_j-\tilde x_i}=m+\boldsymbol{\frac{b(c_j^{-1}-c_i^{-1})}{\tilde x_j-\tilde x_i}}$$ where the term in bold indicates the "offset" between the two points. See my notes here for details.