Isn't the change in the summation variables as intended by the author(Jeff Erickson) wrongly done??
As far as I understood that change in summation variables limits is alike the way we do in Integral Calculus..
If i is $0$ then j should be $ \lg n $
And
if i is $ \lg n $ then j should be $1$..
Could someone just explain me how is the variable being interchanged if I have
misunderstood the concept??
Thanks in Advance!!(Sorry for bad formatting)

I think the limit should be from $j=\log n$ to $j=1$.