This is an attempt to finish up Characterizing the primes which don't divide any Pell-Lucas number(s)
For primes $p \equiv 3 \pmod 4,$ there is always some solution to $x^2 - 2 y^2 = \pm 1$ with $x \equiv 0 \pmod p.$ For primes $p \equiv 5 \pmod 8,$ never. For primes $p = 4 x^2 + 4 x y + 9 y^2 $ or $p = 4 x^2 + 4 x y + 33 y^2, $ always; these are $1 \pmod 8.$ Put another way, these predictable $1 \pmod 8$ primes are $p = u^2 + 8 v^2$ with $v$ required odd, then $p = u^2 + 32 v^2$ with $v$ required odd.
What I am left with is a separation of the primes $p = x^2 + 128 y^2$ into two subsets, one about a third of the primes and the other two thirds. The smaller set, up to 10,000, is
$$ 353, 1153, 1201, 1217, 1601, 2113, 2273, 3137, 4481, 5297, 5569, 6689, 7393, 7793, 8081, 8609, 9521, 9649, $$ The sequence of Pell-Lucas numbers is $P_1 = 1, \; P_2 = 3, \; P_3 = 7, \; P_4 = 17, \; P_{n+2} = 2 P_{n+1} + P_n. $ Note $P_{11} = 8119 = 23 \cdot 353$ and $P_{12} = 19601 = 17 \cdot 1153.$ The indexes for which these primes first occur as factors are
353 position 11
1153 position 12
1201 position 75
1217 position 76
1601 position 100
2113 position 44
2273 position 142
3137 position 196
4481 position 140
5297 position 331
5569 position 116
6689 position 418
7393 position 231
7793 position 487
8081 position 505
8609 position 269
9521 position 595
9649 position 603
The larger list of primes is $$ 137, 521, 569, 593, 857, 953, 1321, 1777, 1993, 2129, 2153, 2377, 2521, 2729, 2777, 2833, 3001, 3209, 3361, 3761, 3929, 4073, 4177, 4289, 4649, 4657, 4721, 4729, 4889, 4969, 5233, 5273, 5449, 5641, 5801, 6353, 6449, 6481, 7001, 7417, 7673, 8089, 8273, 8297, 8329, 8377, 9161, 9281, 9433, 9929, $$ These primes never divide any $u$ with $u^2 - 2 v^2 = \pm 1.$
Up to 1,000,000, there are 4891 primes $p = x^2 + 128 y^2,$ the smaller list has 1666 members, the larger 3225; then $3225/1666 \approx 1.936.$ Up to 10,000,000, there are 41,453 primes $p = x^2 + 128 y^2,$ the smaller list has 13,837 members, the larger 27,616; and $27616/13837 \approx 1.9958.$ Currently running 100,000,000, probably another six hours. Total was about nine hours; up to 100,000,000 there are 359,930 primes $p = x^2 + 128 y^2,$ the smaller list has 119,930 primes, the larger list 240,000, and $240000/119930 \approx 2.001167.$
Anyway, the kind of thing I now how to find is discriminants with, say, the principal genus having the number of classes divisible by 3, in which case the smaller list would be represented by the principal form, as in Cox's book. No luck here.
In comparison, the other side of the coin in Cox's book is a polynomial $f(x)$ for which given primes have a prescribed pattern of roots when considering $f(x) \pmod p.$ The favorable ratio of primes, so close to 2:1, then comes under the heading of Cebotarev Density.
So, there is the overall question, can anyone characterize these primes?
Found an acceptable answer, 1996 article by Pieter Moree, On the prime density of Lucas sequences, Journal de Theorie des Nombres de Bordeaux, volume 8 (1996) pages 449-459.
We find excerpts
So, for what I got, density $1/2$ for all primes $p \equiv 3 \pmod 4.$
Next, for positive binary quadratic forms we have $h(-512) = 8.$ Form Theorem 9.12 on page 188, with example $\Delta = -56$ on page 190, we add
$$ \langle 4,4,33 \rangle : \frac{1}{16}, $$ $$ \langle 9,\pm 8,16 \rangle : \frac{1}{8}, $$ $$ \frac{1}{3} \cdot \langle 1,0,128 \rangle : \frac{1}{3} \cdot \frac{1}{16} = \frac{1}{48}. $$ Then $$ \frac{1}{16} + \frac{1}{8} + \frac{1}{48} = \frac{10}{48} = \frac{5}{24}. $$ Finally $$ \frac{1}{2} + \frac{5}{24} = \frac{17}{24}, $$ which is what Moree requires. So, I think i got it. Have not proved everything, just tested on computer up to 1,000,000. Deterministic up to that point, the check comes under the heading of Pisano periods and is simply not difficult.
I still think that the subset of primes $p=u^2 + 128 v^2$ that work (go into the 17/24) can be described as the primes $1 \pmod 8$ for which some polynomial $f(x)$ of unpredictable degree $n,$ factors into $n$ linear factors, but I am the last person to actually find such a polynomial.