Below is a problem that I did and my answer matched the back of the book, but I do not have confidence that I did it right. Could somebody confirm (or deny) that my solution is correct?
Bob
Problem:
Over a long period of time the grades given by a group of instructors in a
particular course have averaged $12\% A's, 18\% B's, 40\% C's, 18\%D's$ and
$12\%F's$. A new instructor gives $22 A's$, $34 B's$, $66 C's$,
$16 D's$ and $12 F's$ during two semesters. Determine at a $0.05$ significance level whether the new instructor is following the grading pattern set by the
others.
Answer:
We assign the grades the numbers, $4$, $3$, $2$, $1$ and $0$ for the grades
$A$, $B$, $C$, $D$ and $F$, respectively.
\begin{eqnarray*}
n &=& 22 + 34 + 66 + 16 + 12 = 150 \\
\end{eqnarray*}
The expected number of A's is $18$. The expected number of B's is $27$.
The expected number of C's is $60$. The expected number of D's is $27$.
The expected number of F's is $18$.
\begin{eqnarray*}
df &=& 5 - 1 = 4 \\
\chi^2 &=& \frac{(22-18)^2}{18} + \frac{(34-27)^2}{27} + \frac{(66-60)^2}{60} + \frac{(16-27)^2}{27} + \frac{(12-18)^2}{18} \\
\chi^2 &=& \frac{16}{18} + \frac{(7)^2}{27} + \frac{(6)^2}{60} + \frac{(11)^2}{27} + \frac{36}{18} \\
\chi^2 &=& \frac{8}{9} + \frac{49}{27} + \frac{36}{60} + \frac{121}{27} + 2 \\
\chi^2 &=& \frac{8}{9} + \frac{49}{27} + \frac{36}{60} + \frac{121}{27} + 2 \\
\chi^2 &=& 9.7851 \\
\end{eqnarray*}
In this case we have $P(\chi^2 < 9.7851) = 0.96$, hence we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the new instructor grades are not following the
pattern of the old instructors.
That's correct!
Let $$H_0 :p_1=0.12, p_2=0.18, p_3=0.4, p_4=0.18, p_5=0.12$$
$$H_a: \text{ at least one of these probabilities does not hold}$$
R statistical software confirms your result.
Our p-value is $0.04421$ so at $\alpha=0.05$ we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the new instructor is not following the grading pattern set by the others.
Note: Your method of finding $P(\chi^2 \lt 9.785)=0.96$ and concluding significance since $0.96\gt 0.95$ works but is unconventional. Better to just say $P(\chi^2 \gt 9.785)=0.04$