Comparing two solutions of the first part of 3.2.2 in Allen Hatcher Alg. Top.

87 Views Asked by At

Here is the question I am trying to compare two solutions of it:

Using the cup product $H^k(X, A;R) \times H^l(X,B;R) \to H^{k+l}(X, A\cup B;R),$ show that if $X$ is the union of contractible open subsets $A$ and $B,$ then all cup products of positive-dimensional classes in $H^*(X;R)$ are zero.

Here is the first solution:

enter image description here

My concerns about it is as follows:

I think I understand this solution, and nothing bothers me in it (Hopefully it is correct, let me know if there are typos that I missed in it please)

Here is the second solution:

enter image description here

My questions about it are:

What exactly this author is doing? Why using excision? Why he is proving using cochains?

Could someone help me answer these questions please?