I want to compute the inverse Laplace transform of a function $$ F(z) = e^{-\sqrt{z}}. $$ This problem seems very nontrivial to me. Here one can find the answer: the inverse Laplace transform of one variable function $e^{-\sqrt{z}}$ is equal to $$ \mathcal{L}^{-1}[e^{-\sqrt{z}}](x) = \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{\pi}} x^{-\frac{3}{2}} \exp \left( -\frac{1}{4x} \right). $$ But what is the simpliest way to do it? Post's formula requires knowledge of all degree derivatives of $e^{-\sqrt{z}}$ and I think that it isn't a good way. The classical inversion formula is of the form $$ \mathcal{L}^{-1}[F(z)](x) = \frac{1}{2 \pi i}\int\limits_{\sigma - i \infty}^{\sigma + i \infty} F(z) e^{zx}\,dz = \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int\limits_{\sigma - i \infty}^{\sigma + i \infty} e^{-\sqrt{z}+zx} \, dz. $$ To compute it I make a substitution $p = \sqrt{z}$. Then I'm looking for the image of the line $\sigma + i \mathbb{R}$. If I'm not mistaken it is the angle with vertice at $\sqrt{\sigma}$ and with rays $\sqrt{\sigma} + e^{i \frac{\pi}{4}} [0,\infty)$ and $\sqrt{\sigma}+e^{-i\frac{\pi}{4}} [0,\infty)$ (not exactly, these rays are curvilinear, but I think that this doesn't matter because of Cauchy formula). I will denote it $\Lambda$. So $$ \mathcal{L}^{-1}[e^{-\sqrt{z}}] = \frac{1}{\pi i} \int\limits_{\Lambda} e^{-p + p^2 x}p \, dp. $$ Then I should look for residues, but integrand doesn't have them in finite part of $\mathop{\mathrm{conv}} \Lambda$. Please help me wiith it.
2026-04-09 07:43:48.1775720628
Compute the inverse Laplace transform of $e^{-\sqrt{z}}$
11k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ANALYSIS
- Analytical solution of a nonlinear ordinary differential equation
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Show that $d:\mathbb{C}\times\mathbb{C}\rightarrow[0,\infty[$ is a metric on $\mathbb{C}$.
- conformal mapping and rational function
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Proving whether function-series $f_n(x) = \frac{(-1)^nx}n$
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Proving smoothness for a sequence of functions.
- How to prove that $E_P(\frac{dQ}{dP}|\mathcal{G})$ is not equal to $0$
- Integral of ratio of polynomial
Related Questions in LAPLACE-TRANSFORM
- Solution to ODE with Dirac Delta satisfies ODE
- Calculating an inverse Laplace transform
- Laplace Transform working out
- How to solve the integral equation $f(x) = \int_0^x f(x-y)k(x,y)dy+g(x)$ for $f(x)$?
- Laplace Transform for an Initial Value Problem
- Laplace transform of a one-sided full-wave rectified...
- Laplace transform for the solution of a system of differential equations with no constant coefficients
- Question about Dirac comb
- Using Laplace transforms to solve a differential equation
- Prove $\int_0^{\infty} \frac{\cos xt}{1+t^2} dt = \frac{\pi}{2}e^{-x}$ by using Laplace Transform
Related Questions in RESIDUE-CALCULUS
- How to get to $\frac{1}{2\pi i} \oint_C \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)} \, dz =n_0-n_p$ from Cauchy's residue theorem?
- contour integral involving the Gamma function
- The Cauchy transform of Marchenko-Pastur law
- Contour Integration with $\sec{(\sqrt{1-x^2})}$
- calculate $\int_{-\infty}^\infty\frac{e^{ix} \, dx}{x^3-3ix^2+2x+2i}$
- Integral $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{ \exp\left( i a e^{u}\right) }{ e^{b \cosh(u)} - 1 } du$
- Solve the improper integral with techniques of complex analysis
- Compute the integral with use of complex analysis techniques
- $\int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{1}{e^{x^{2}}+1}dx$
- Residue Theorem: Inside vs. Outside
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You can use a contour integration without that substitution as follows by deforming the Bromwich contour about the negative real axis and exploiting a branch cut of $\sqrt{z}$ about that axis. So, consider the integral
$$\oint_C dz \: e^{-\sqrt{z}} e^{z t}$$
where $C$ is a keyhole contour about the negative real axis, as pictured below.
We will define $\text{Arg}{z} \in (-\pi,\pi]$, so the branch is the negative real axis. There are $6$ pieces to this contour, $C_k$, $k \in \{1,2,3,4,5,6\}$, as follows.
$C_1$ is the contour along the line $z \in [c-i R,c+i R]$ for some large value of $R$.
$C_2$ is the contour along a circular arc of radius $R$ from the top of $C_1$ to just above the negative real axis.
$C_3$ is the contour along a line just above the negative real axis between $[-R, -\epsilon]$ for some small $\epsilon$.
$C_4$ is the contour along a circular arc of radius $\epsilon$ about the origin.
$C_5$ is the contour along a line just below the negative real axis between $[-\epsilon,-R]$.
$C_6$ is the contour along the circular arc of radius $R$ from just below the negative real axis to the bottom of $C_1$.
We will show that the integral along $C_2$,$C_4$, and $C_6$ vanish in the limits of $R \rightarrow \infty$ and $\epsilon \rightarrow 0$.
On $C_2$, the real part of the argument of the exponential is
$$R t \cos{\theta} - \sqrt{R} \cos{\frac{\theta}{2}}$$
where $\theta \in [\pi/2,\pi)$. Clearly, $\cos{\theta} < 0$ and $\cos{\frac{\theta}{2}} > 0$, so that the integrand exponentially decays as $R \rightarrow \infty$ and therefore the integral vanishes along $C_2$.
On $C_6$, we have the same thing, but now $\theta \in (-\pi,-\pi/2]$. This means that, due to the evenness of cosine, the integrand exponentially decays again as $R \rightarrow \infty$ and therefore the integral also vanishes along $C_6$.
On $C_4$, the integral vanishes as $\epsilon$ in the limit $\epsilon \rightarrow 0$. Thus, we are left with the following by Cauchy's integral theorem (i.e., no poles inside $C$):
$$\left [ \int_{C_1} + \int_{C_3} + \int_{C_5}\right] dz \: e^{-\sqrt{z}} e^{z t} = 0$$
On $C_3$, we parametrize by $z=e^{i \pi} x$ and the integral along $C_3$ becomes
$$\int_{C_3} dz \: e^{-\sqrt{z}} e^{z t} = e^{i \pi} \int_{\infty}^0 dx \: e^{-i \sqrt{x}} e^{-x t}$$
On $C_5$, however, we parametrize by $z=e^{-i \pi} x$ and the integral along $C_5$ becomes
$$\int_{C_5} dz \: e^{-\sqrt{z}} e^{z t} = e^{-i \pi} \int_0^{\infty} dx \: e^{i \sqrt{x}} e^{-x t}$$
We may now write
$$-\frac{1}{i 2 \pi} \int_0^{\infty} dx \: e^{- x t} \left ( e^{i \sqrt{x}} - e^{-i \sqrt{x}} \right ) + \frac{1}{i 2 \pi} \int_{c-i \infty}^{c+i \infty} ds \: e^{-\sqrt{s}} e^{s t} = 0$$
Therefore, the ILT of $\hat{f}(s) = e^{-\sqrt{s}}$ is given by
$$\begin{align}\frac{1}{i 2 \pi} \int_{c-i \infty}^{c+i \infty} ds \: e^{-\sqrt{s}} e^{s t} &= \frac{1}{i 2 \pi} \int_0^{\infty} dx \: e^{- x t} \left ( e^{i \sqrt{x}} - e^{-i \sqrt{x}} \right )\\ &= \frac{1}{\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} du\: u \,e^{-t u^2} \sin{u}\end{align}$$
The last step involved substituting $x=u^2$ and exploiting the evenness of the integrand. This integral may be evaluated as follows:
$$\begin{align}\frac{1}{\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} du\: u \,e^{-t u^2} \sin{u} &= \frac{1}{\pi} \Im{\left [\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} du\:u\, e^{-t u^2} e^{i u} \right]}\\ &= \frac{1}{\pi} \Im{\left [\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} du\:u\, e^{-t (u-i/(2 t))^2} e^{-1/(4 t)}\right ]}\\ &= \frac{1}{\pi} e^{-1/(4 t)} \Im{\left [\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dv \: \left ( v + \frac{i}{2 t} \right ) e^{-t v^2} \right]}\\ &= \frac{1}{\pi} e^{-1/(4 t)} \frac{1}{2 t} \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{t}} \end{align}$$
Therefore the result is that
$$\mathcal{L}^{-1}[e^{-\sqrt{z}}](t) = \frac{1}{i 2 \pi} \int_{c-i \infty}^{c+i \infty} dz \: e^{-\sqrt{z}} e^{z t} = \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{\pi}} t^{-3/2} e^{-\frac{1}{4 t}}$$
as was to be shown.