If:
$E[Y]=E[Z]+aE[G]+a^2E[H]$
Does the following expression hold:
$E[Y|F]=E[Z|F]+aE[G|F]+a^2E[H|F]$
?
p.s. If so, I would appreciate a reference to a proof .
If:
$E[Y]=E[Z]+aE[G]+a^2E[H]$
Does the following expression hold:
$E[Y|F]=E[Z|F]+aE[G|F]+a^2E[H|F]$
?
p.s. If so, I would appreciate a reference to a proof .
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
No. What is true is that:
However $\mathsf E(Y)=\mathsf E(Z+aG+a^2H)$ does not necessarily infer that $Y=Z+aG+a^2H$, and so will not chain to the suggested hypothesis.
Disproof by Counterexample:
Let $a=0$ so we can ignore $G$ and $H$. Let the sample space be $\{(0,1), (0,2), (3,0)\}$, with these outcomes uniformly distributed, then take $Y$ as the value of the first member of the outcome, $Z$ that of the second, and $F$ their sum.
We have that $\mathsf E(Y)=1$, $\mathsf E(Z)=1$, but $\mathsf E(Y\mid F) = \begin{cases}0 &:& F\in\{1,2\}\\3&:& F=3\end{cases}$ and $\mathsf E(Z\mid F) = \begin{cases}F &:& F\in\{1,2\}\\0&:& F=3\end{cases}$.
So $\mathsf E(Y)=\mathsf E(Z)$ but $\mathsf E(Y\mid F)\neq \mathsf E(Z\mid F)$.
The existence of this witness is sufficient to disprove the hypothesis.
$\blacksquare$