I was reading about Brower's fixed point theorem and a doubt came to mind about the underlying function of a functor on morphisms. We can think of $\mathbb{S}^1 $ as a subset of $\mathbb{R}^2$, so we get the inclusion map $i : \mathbb{S}^1 \hookrightarrow \mathbb{R}^2$, of course we have the identity map $\mathrm{id}: \mathbb{S}^1 \rightarrow \mathbb{S}^1 $. As we know, the first fundamental group is a functor so $\pi^1(i : \mathbb{S}^1 \hookrightarrow \mathbb{R}^2)=0$ since $\mathbb{R}^2$ is contractible, also $\pi^1(\mathrm{id}: \mathbb{S}^1 \rightarrow \mathbb{S}^1)= \mathrm{id}_\mathbb{Z}: \mathbb{Z}\rightarrow \mathbb{Z}$. So far so good, but as functions, i.e. some subset of a cartesian product with some property, $i= \mathrm{id}$, and thus the underlying function of the functor is ill defined. So, what I'm asking is, what am I missing? Are these functions different since we are looking them as morphisms? From what definition does this follow? I'm pretty sure that when we say that a morphism has a domain and a codomain we actually are saying the morphisms are triples, but I'm feeling little insecure. Any insight is appreciated.
2026-03-26 04:50:46.1774500646
Confusion about the underlying function of a Functor.
88 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONS
- Functions - confusion regarding properties, as per example in wiki
- Composition of functions - properties
- Finding Range from Domain
- Why is surjectivity defined using $\exists$ rather than $\exists !$
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Lower bound of bounded functions.
- Does there exist any relationship between non-constant $N$-Exhaustible function and differentiability?
- Given a function, prove that it's injective
- Surjective function proof
- How to find image of a function
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in FUNCTORS
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Two morphisms $f, g : M \to L$ are equal as long as they are equal under the limit $L$.
- Co- and contravariance of vectors vs co- and contravariant functors
- Discrete simplicial sets: equivalent definitions, request for a proof
- Simplicial sets, injectivity
- When can functors fail to be adjoints if their hom sets are bijective?
- Example of a functor that doesn't reflect isomorphism
- Equality of functors
- Example of functor not full not faithfull
- Bijective on objects implies essentially surjection
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
A continuous map $f:(X,x_0)\to (Y,y_0)$ induces a homomorphism $f_*:\pi_1(X,x_0)\to\pi_1(Y,y_0)$ between the fundamental groups, two examples being the identity and inclusion maps $$ f:S^1\to S^1, \ g:S^1\to \mathbb{R}^2 $$ which give rise to the identity and trivial homomorphisms $$ f_*:\mathbb{Z}\to\mathbb{Z}, \ g_*:\mathbb{Z}\to1. $$ The two "morphisms" $f$ and $g$ are not the same, since they have different codomains.
In general, a (covariant) functor $\mathcal{F}$ takes objects $A$ and $B$ to objects $\mathcal{F}(A)$ and $\mathcal{F}(B)$ and a morphism $f:A\to B$ to the morphism $\mathcal{F}(f):\mathcal{F}(A)\to\mathcal{F}(B)$ (respecting composition, etc.). In other words, the codomain is part of the information of a morphism as you say.
This is a feature, not a bug - we definitely want to view putting the circle inside itself as distinct from putting the circle into the plane, especially from the homotopic point of view.
For the fixed-point theorem, the assumption of a retract $r:D\to S^1$ from the disc to its boundary circle gives a contradiction after applying the $\pi_1$ functor. The composition $$ S^1\xrightarrow{i}D\xrightarrow{r}S^1 $$ becomes $$ \mathbb{Z}\xrightarrow{i_*}1\xrightarrow{r_*}\mathbb{Z}. $$ On the one hand $\pi_1(r\circ i)$ should be the identity homomorphism since $r\circ i$ is the identity map. However, this homomorphism factors through the trivial group and must therefore be trivial. Hence the retract $r$ cannot exist.