I am currently studying the book 'How to Think Like a Mathematician' and working on Part 5. I have some confusion regarding the process of checking my own proofs. Sometimes, I feel that a particular step is incorrect, but I cannot provide a solid reason why, nor can I explain why it is correct. For example, in the proof of 'If m²|n², then m|n,' I have proven it as follows: By assuming the existence of k² ∈ ℤ such that n² = m²k², we can conclude that n = mk, which means that m divides n. However, I have a feeling that taking k² ∈ ℤ might be incorrect, but I don't know why, nor do I have a solid reason for why it is correct.
2026-05-15 19:46:24.1778874384
Confusion while checking own proofs
86 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ELEMENTARY-NUMBER-THEORY
- Maximum number of guaranteed coins to get in a "30 coins in 3 boxes" puzzle
- Interesting number theoretical game
- How do I show that if $\boldsymbol{a_1 a_2 a_3\cdots a_n \mid k}$ then each variable divides $\boldsymbol k $?
- Using only the digits 2,3,9, how many six-digit numbers can be formed which are divisible by 6?
- Algebra Proof including relative primes.
- How do I show that any natural number of this expression is a natural linear combination?
- Counting the number of solutions of the congruence $x^k\equiv h$ (mod q)
- algebraic integers of $x^4 -10x^2 +1$
- What exactly is the definition of Carmichael numbers?
- Number of divisors 888,888.
Related Questions in SOLUTION-VERIFICATION
- Linear transform of jointly distributed exponential random variables, how to identify domain?
- Exercise 7.19 from Papa Rudin: Gathering solutions
- Proof verification: $\forall n \in \mathbb{Z}, 4\nmid(n^2+2)$
- Proof verification: a function with finitely many points of discontinuity is Riemann integrable
- Do Monoid Homomorphisms preserve the identity?
- Cantor-Lebesgue's theorem
- If $a$ is an integer, prove that $\gcd(14a + 3, 21a + 4) = 1$.
- Number theory gcd
- $|G| > 1$ and not prime implies existence of a subgroup other than two trivial subgroups
- Prove/Disprove: Sum of im/ker of linear transformation contained in ker/im of each linear trasnfromation
Related Questions in PROOF-WRITING
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Do these special substring sets form a matroid?
- How do I prove this question involving primes?
- Total number of nodes in a full k-ary tree. Explanation
- Prove all limit points of $[a,b]$ are in $[a,b]$
- $\inf A = -\sup (-A)$
- Prove that $\sup(cA)=c\sup(A)$.
- Supremum of Sumset (Proof Writing)
- Fibonacci Numbers Proof by Induction (Looking for Feedback)
- Is my method correct for to prove $a^{\log_b c} = c^{\log_b a}$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
geometry
circles
algebraic-number-theory
functions
real-analysis
elementary-set-theory
proof-verification
proof-writing
number-theory
elementary-number-theory
puzzle
game-theory
calculus
multivariable-calculus
partial-derivative
complex-analysis
logic
set-theory
second-order-logic
homotopy-theory
winding-number
ordinary-differential-equations
numerical-methods
derivatives
integration
definite-integrals
probability
limits
sequences-and-series
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I can't answer the general question about what is a suitable learning practice; that will depend on the person and on the goals.
But I can answer the specific question about your proof:
There are two mistakes here. One is important, the other is not. The unimportant mistake is going from: $n^2=m^2k^2$ and deducing: $n=mk$. It may be that $n=-mk$, for all you know. But in that case it would still be true that $m|n$, so it's not a big deal (you should still watch out for it though: it might have been a big deal).
The slightly more serious mistake is saying that there should be $k\in\Bbb Z$ with $n^2=m^2k^2$. You were right to feel uneasy about this step. In general, I would advise seriously asking yourself why is that true before you write it down: it's easy for carelessness to creep in, so self-checking can be helpful.
$m^2|n^2$ tells you only that there is a (nonnegative) integer $\lambda$ with $n^2=m^2\lambda$. But, a priori, it's not necessarily the case that $\sqrt{\lambda}\in\Bbb Z$: suppose, for instance, that $n^2=3m^2$. As $\sqrt{3}$ is not an integer (or even a rational) your proof does not apply.
Hint: is it possible for $n^2=m^2\lambda$ to be true, with all quantities being integers, if $\sqrt{\lambda}\notin\Bbb Z$? Prove or disprove it!