A few months ago I proved that if $A $ and $B$ are connected subspaces of a topological space $X$ and $A \cap B \neq \emptyset$ then $A \cup B$ is a connected subspace of $ X$. I did a proof by contradiction: Assume $A \cup B$ is disconnected. Then there exists open sets $C,D$, which are subsets of $A \cup B$, such that $C$ and $D$ are non-empty, their intersection is empty, and $C \cup D = A \cup B$. Since $A \cap B \neq \emptyset$ then there exists a $p$ belonging to $A$ and $B$. So $p$ is in $A \cup B$. $p$ is also in $C \cup D$. WLOG, let $p$ be in $C$. Since $p$ is in $C$ and $p$ is in $A$, then $p $ is in $A \cup C$. I cannot for the life of me remember why $A \cap C \neq \emptyset$ and $A$ being connected means $A$ is a subset of $ C$.
2026-04-03 02:39:52.1775183992
Connected Subspaces of a Topological Space
154 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in CONNECTEDNESS
- Estimation of connected components
- decomposing a graph in connected components
- Proving that we can divide a graph to two graphs which induced subgraph is connected on vertices of each one
- Does every connected topological space have the property that you can walk around a finite open cover to get from any point to any other?
- A set with more than $n$ components has $n+1$ pairwise separated subsets.
- Can connectedness preservation be used to define continuity of a function?
- Prove the set is not connected
- Related the property of two points contained in the same component
- Is a connected component a group?
- f is a continuous function from (X,$\tau$) to {0,1} with discrete topology, if f non constant then (X,$\tau$) disconnected
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If $p$ is in $A$ and $C$ like you said, then $p\in A\cap C$, so $A\cap C\neq\varnothing$.
For your second question, let $A$ be a connected subspace of some of disconnected space $X$ (in the context of your problem, $X=A\cup B$). Then, $X=C\cup D$, where $C\cap D=\varnothing$ and are open in the topology of $X$. Suppose $A$ has elements in both $C$ and $D$. Because we suppose $A$ to be connected, we know that $A$ as a subspace endowed with the subspace topology must be connected. But because $A$ has elements in $C$ and $D$, $A\cap C$ and $A\cap D$ disconnect $A$ in the subspace topology, contradicting our claim that $A$ is connected in the subspace topology, which in turn contradicts our assumption that $A$ is connected in $X$. Thus, $A$ must be completely contained in either $C$ or $D$.
There is also a slightly shorter method to your proof using just the open sets (not specific points in $A$). Suppose $A$ and $B$ are connected in $X$, and $A\cup B$ is disconnected. Then, there exist $C,D\in(A\cup B,\tau_S)$ such that $A\cup B=C\cup D$, $C\cap D=\varnothing$, and $C,D\neq A\cup B$. But the only way for this to happen (with the condition that $A,B$ are connected in $X$ and by the result proved in the previous paragraph) is if $A$ is entirely contained in $C$ or $D$, and $B$ is entirely contained in the other set (e.g., $A\subseteq C$ and $B\subseteq D$). But because $C\cap D=\varnothing$, $A\cap B=\varnothing$. Thus, $A\cup B$ is disconnected in the subspace topology, which by definition makes it disconnected in $X$. Thus, if $A,B$ are connected in $X$ with $A\cap B\neq\varnothing$, then $A\cup B$ is also connected in $X$.