Suppose I have the function $_2F_1\left(a,b;c;x^2\right)$ with $a=\frac{3}{4}+\frac{k}{4}$, $b=\frac{3}{4}-\frac{k}{4}$ and $c=\frac{1}{2}$. I want to know the behaviour about $x=1.\,$ I go to DLMF equation 15.10.21 and choose $$ w_1\left(x^2\right) = {\frac {\Gamma \left( c \right) \Gamma \left( c-a-b \right)}{ \Gamma \left( c-a \right) \Gamma \left( c-b \right) }} \, w_3\left(x^2\right) +{\frac {\Gamma \left( c \right) \Gamma \left( a+b-c \right)}{\Gamma \left( a \right) \Gamma \left( b \right) }} \, w_4\left(x^2\right). $$ Since $w_4$ is singular at $x=1$ (and it should be finite) I expected this typical constraint that $a$ or $b$ must be some $n\leq 0 \in \mathbb{Z}$ for the second term to vanish. Now the first term has $\Gamma(-1)$. Is that a problem or can I absorb this into a constant? However if I do so, then the original function $w_1$ is not really defined. Does this mean the solution is not valid unless $k=3$?
PS: Actually if $k=4n+3$ $(n\geq 0)$ then the second term vanishes and in the first term the poles cancel?
The first thing to notice is that the equation is symmetric in $\, a,b \,$ which comes from changing $\, k \,$ to $\, -k. \,$ Thus, without loss of generality suppose $\, k\ge 0. \,$ Let us define some notation: $\, f_3 := (\Gamma(c)\Gamma(c-a-b))/(\Gamma(c-a)\Gamma(c-b)), \quad f_4 := (\Gamma(c)\Gamma(a+b-c))/(\Gamma(a)\Gamma(b)) $ which are multiplied by $\, w_3(z) \,$ and $\, w_4(z) \,$ respectively. The equation is $\, w_1(z) = w_3(z) f_3 + w_4(z) f_4. \,$ Note that we will also add $\,\epsilon\,$ to $\,a\,$ to probe sensitivity to parameters. We are interested in the values of the functions at $\, z=1. \,$ For all integer $\, k, \,$ we have $\, w_3(1) = 1. \,$ We have the cases:
If $\, k \,$ is even, $\, w_1 \,$ has a pole at $\,z=1,\,$ but the factor $\, f_3 \,$ has an $\, \epsilon \,$ pole, and $\, w_4 \,$ has an $\, \epsilon \,$ pole, but its factor $\, f_4 \,$ is finite.
If $\, k=1 \,$ then both $\, w_1 \,$ and $\, w_4 \,$ have a $\, z=1 \,$ pole while $\, f_3 = 0. \,$
If $\, k>1 \,$ and $\, k=4n+1 \,$ then $\, w_1 \,$ has a pole at $\,z=1,\,$ while $\, f_3 \,$ has an $\, \epsilon \,$ pole, and $\, w_4 \,$ has an $\, \epsilon \,$ pole while $\, f_4 \,$ is finite.
If $\, k = 4n+3, \,$ then $\, w_1, w_3, f_3 \,$ are all finite, while $\, f_4 = 0 \,$ but $\, w_4 \,$ has both a $\, z=1 \,$ pole and an $\, \epsilon \,$ pole. Note that $\, w_1(z) \,$ is a polynomial in $\, z \,$ with $\, w_1(1) = 1. \,$