Consider the symmetric RW on a graph constructed from the two complete graphs $K_{m}$ and $K_{n}$ in such a way that the two complete graphs have exactly 2 common vertices. S is one of the common vertices. Let A and B be "Blackholes" or endpoints on $K_{m}$ and $K_{n}$ respectively, and let $m = 10^{6}$ and $n = 2 * 10^{6}$ (i.e., million and two-million). Find the average travel time to any blackhole. Figure for reference where m=4, n=5
2026-04-07 00:22:57.1775521377
Consider the symmetric RW on a graph constructed from two complete graphs such a way that the two complete graphs have 2 common vertices
45 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY
- How to prove $\lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} e^{-n}\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{n^k}{k!} = \frac{1}{2}$?
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- A random point $(a,b)$ is uniformly distributed in a unit square $K=[(u,v):0<u<1,0<v<1]$
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Solution Check. (Probability)
- Interpreting stationary distribution $P_{\infty}(X,V)$ of a random process
Related Questions in GRAPH-THEORY
- characterisation of $2$-connected graphs with no even cycles
- Explanation for the static degree sort algorithm of Deo et al.
- A certain partition of 28
- decomposing a graph in connected components
- Is it true that if a graph is bipartite iff it is class 1 (edge-coloring)?
- Fake induction, can't find flaw, every graph with zero edges is connected
- Triangle-free graph where every pair of nonadjacent vertices has exactly two common neighbors
- Inequality on degrees implies perfect matching
- Proving that no two teams in a tournament win same number of games
- Proving that we can divide a graph to two graphs which induced subgraph is connected on vertices of each one
Related Questions in RANDOM-WALK
- Random walk on $\mathbb{Z}^2$
- Density distribution of random walkers in a unit sphere with an absorbing boundary
- Monkey Random walk using binomial distribution
- Find probability function of random walk, stochastic processes
- Random walk with probability $p \neq 1$ of stepping at each $\Delta t$
- Average distance between consecutive points in a one-dimensional auto-correlated sequence
- Return probability random walk
- Random Walk: Quantiles, average and maximal walk
- motion on the surface of a 3-sphere
- Probability of symmetric random walk being in certain interval on nth step
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The standard way to solve a hitting time problem is to define a variable $t_v$ for every vertex $v$ which denotes the expected hitting time for a random walk starting at $v$. You'd set $t_A = t_B = 0$; for all other $v$, $t_v$ would be $1$ more than the average value of all its neighbors.
Here, you don't want to do that, because you'd have around three million variables.
Fortunately, we can simplify the process: the average travel time is the same for any vertex (other than $A$) in the first clique but not the second; the same for any vertex (other than $B$) in the second clique but not the first; and the same for either of the vertices in both cliques.
So let's just define three variables: $t_1$ for the expected hitting time starting in the first clique, $t_2$ for the expected hitting time starting in the second clique, and $t_{12}$ for the expected hitting time starting in the overlap. We can write down a linear equation for each one of them: for example, for $t_1$ we get the equation $$ t_1 = 1 + \frac1{m-1} \cdot t_A + \frac{2}{m-1} \cdot t_{12} + \frac{m-4}{m-1} \cdot t_1 \implies \frac{3}{m-1} t_1 - \frac{2}{m-1} t_{12} = 1. $$ Solve all three equations and you get the three hitting times you want; I think in your case, you're starting in the middle, so you want to know $t_{12}$.