Fix any positive integer $n$ and suppose that $C$ is a non-empty, bounded convex subset of $\mathbb R^n$.
Let $\overline C$ denote the closure of $C$ (with respect to the Euclidean topology on $\mathbb R^n$).
Suppose that $\{y^m\}_{m=1}^{\infty}$ is a countable, dense subset of $\overline C$ and that $(\lambda_m)_{m=1}^{\infty}$ is a sequence of strictly positive numbers summing up to $1$.
My conjecture is that $$y\equiv\sum_{m=1}^{\infty}\lambda_my^m\in C.$$
Clearly, this infinite convex combination must be contained in $\overline C$, but I think the positivity of the weights and the denseness of $\{y^m\}_{m=1}^{\infty}$ in $\overline C$ actually force $y$ to be in $C$.
Can anyone help me come up with a rigorous argument supporting this hunch?
Let $x$ be a point in the relative interior of $C$, $y$ be any point in the closure of $C$ and $\lambda$ a number strictly between $0$ and $1$. Then $\lambda x+(1-\lambda)y$ is in the relative interior of $C$. Indeed, if $O\subseteq C$ is a relatively open neighborhood of $x$, then $\lambda O+(1-\lambda)y$ is a neighborhood of $\lambda x+(1-\lambda)y$ included in the closure of $C$. There must be a smaller neighborhood fully included in $C$.
The sequence must contain a point in the relative interior since it is dense, and you can write the infinite sum as a proper convex combination of this point and a point in the closure of $C$; so the result follows from the argument above.