Hi guys I have problems with this convolution:
$\big(e^{-x/5}\chi_{[0,\infty)}(x)\big)*\big(e^{x/3}\chi_{(-\infty,0]}(x)\big)$.
I thought that since $\chi_{[0,\infty)}(x)$ is zero for $x<0$ and since $\chi_{(-\infty,0]}(y-x)$ is zero for $x<y$ the convolution could become something like this:
$(f*g)(y)=\int_y^\infty{e^{-x/5}e^{y/3}e^{-x/3}dx}$
but I have a feeling that this is terribly wrong. Can you guys help me here calculating this convolution possibly showing the steps? Thanks a lot :)
2026-04-09 13:22:55.1775740975
convolution between $f=e^{-x/5}\chi_{[0,\infty)}(x)$ and $g=e^{x/3}\chi_{(-\infty,0]}(x)$
54 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FOURIER-ANALYSIS
- An estimate in the introduction of the Hilbert transform in Grafakos's Classical Fourier Analysis
- Verifying that translation by $h$ in time is the same as modulating by $-h$ in frequency (Fourier Analysis)
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Understanding Book Proof that $[-2 \pi i x f(x)]^{\wedge}(\xi) = {d \over d\xi} \widehat{f}(\xi)$
- Proving the sharper form of the Lebesgue Differentiation Theorem
- Exercise $10$ of Chapter $4$ in Fourier Analysis by Stein & Shakarchi
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Taking the Discrete Inverse Fourier Transform of a Continuous Forward Transform
- Is $x(t) = \sin(3t) + \cos\left({2\over3}t\right) + \cos(\pi t)$ periodic?
- Translation of the work of Gauss where the fast Fourier transform algorithm first appeared
Related Questions in FOURIER-TRANSFORM
- Proof of Fourier transform of cos$2\pi ft$
- Find the convergence of series of a sequence of functions in $L^2(\mathbb{R})$
- solving a simple ODE with Fourier transform
- How can we prove that $e^{-jωn}$ converges at $0$ while n -> infinity?
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Taking the Discrete Inverse Fourier Transform of a Continuous Forward Transform
- Arcsin of a number greater than one
- Complex numbers in programming
- Power spectrum of field over an arbitrarily-shaped country
- Computing an inverse Fourier Transform / Solving the free particle Schrödinger equation with a gaussian wave packet as initial condition
Related Questions in CONVOLUTION
- What is the result of $x(at) * δ(t-k)$
- Convolution sum
- PDF of the sum of two random variables integrates to >1
- If $u \in \mathscr{L}^1(\lambda^n), v\in \mathscr{L}^\infty (\lambda^n)$, then $u \star v$ is bounded and continuous.
- Proof of Young's inequality $\Vert u \star v \Vert_p \le \Vert u \Vert_1 \Vert v \Vert_p.$
- Duhamel's principle for heat equation.
- Computing the convolution of $f(x)=\gamma1_{(\alpha,\alpha+\beta)}(x)$
- Convolution of distributions property
- Self-convolution of $f(\vec{r}) = e^{-x^2-y^2}/r^2$
- Inverse $z$-transform similar to convolution
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
For the functions like this (described in one relation) it is routine to evaluate convolution actually, beware of multi-relation functions like piece-wise linear ones and other similar functions.
Notice that $f(x) = e^{-\frac{x}{5}}u(x)$ and $g(x) = e^{\frac{x}{3}}u(-x)$ where $u(x)$ is the unit step function aka Heaviside step function which is
$$u(x) = \begin{cases} 1 \qquad,x\ge0\\ 0\qquad, \text{otherwise} \end{cases}$$
Now we write the definition of convolution
$$h(x) = f(x)*g(x) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(\lambda)g(x-\lambda)d\lambda$$
And now substitute
$$h(x) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-\frac{\lambda}{5}}u(\lambda)e^{\frac{x-\lambda}{3}}u(-(x-\lambda)) d\lambda = \begin{cases} e^{\frac{x}{3}}\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-\frac{\lambda}{5}}e^{-\frac{\lambda}{3}} d\lambda \qquad \text{if }\; x < 0\\ e^{\frac{x}{3}}\int_{x}^{\infty}e^{-\frac{\lambda}{5}}e^{-\frac{\lambda}{3}} d\lambda \qquad \text{if }\; x \ge 0 \end{cases}$$
Where we used the fact that $u(\lambda)\neq 0$ when $\lambda \ge 0$ and similarly $u(-(x-\lambda))\neq 0$ when $\lambda\ge x$. Now we evaluate the last integrals
$$h(x) = \begin{cases} e^{\frac{x}{3}}\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-\frac{\lambda}{5}}e^{-\frac{\lambda}{3}} d\lambda = \frac{15}{8}e^{\frac{x}{3}} \qquad \text{if } \; x < 0\\ e^{\frac{x}{3}}\int_{x}^{\infty}e^{-\frac{\lambda}{5}}e^{-\frac{\lambda}{3}} d\lambda = \frac{15}{8}e^{-\frac{x}{5}} \quad\;\; \text{if }\; x \ge 0 \end{cases}$$
Therefore $h(x) = \frac{15}{8}e^{\frac{x}{3}}u(-x) + \frac{15}{8}e^{-\frac{x}{5}}u(x)$
Now you try to calculate this integral like $h(x) = g(x)*f(x) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(\lambda)f(x-\lambda)d\lambda$
and see that you get the same result.