Assume X, Y : Ω → $\Bbb R$ are random variables, defined on a common probability space (Ω, $\mathscr{F}$, $ \Bbb P$). If we want to prove X and Y are independent, can we just check that the generators {{X ∈ A} : A ∈ $\mathscr{A}$} and {{Y ∈ B} : B ∈$ \mathscr{E}$} are independent as systems, where $σ(\mathscr{A}) = σ(\mathscr{E}) = \mathscr{B} $ and $\mathscr{B}$ is the Borel σ-algebra? I guess the answer is no, because in general cases, the generators need to be closed under intersection. But I cannot find a counterexample. Please help, thanks.
2026-03-25 19:01:55.1774465315
Counterexample for a statement about independence of random variables
285 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY-THEORY
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Is there a contradiction in coin toss of expected / actual results?
- Sample each point with flipping coin, what is the average?
- Random variables coincide
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in RANDOM-VARIABLES
- Prove that central limit theorem Is applicable to a new sequence
- Random variables in integrals, how to analyze?
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- Determine the repartition of $Y$
- What is the name of concepts that are used to compare two values?
- Convergence of sequences of RV
- $\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} P(S_n \leq \frac{3n}{2}+\sqrt3n)$
- PDF of the sum of two random variables integrates to >1
- Another definition for the support of a random variable
- Uniform distribution on the [0,2]
Related Questions in INDEPENDENCE
- How to prove mutually independence?
- Simple example dependent variables but under some conditions independent
- Perturbing equivalent measures
- How to prove conditional independence properties
- How do I prove A and B are independent given C?
- Forming an orthonormal basis with these independent vectors
- Independence of stochastic processes
- joint probability density function for $ X = \sqrt(V) \cdot cos(\Phi) $ and $ Y = \sqrt(V) \cdot sin(\Phi) $
- How predictable is $Y$, given values of $X_i$s?
- Each vertex of the square has a value which is randomly chosen from a set.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This seems to be a counterexample (inspired by Bernstein's example). Consider a probability space $\Omega=\{0,1,2,3\}$ (all sets are measurable and all elementary outcomes are equiprobable).
Random variables are $X(\omega)=\omega$ and $Y(\omega)=\begin{cases}1, \ \omega \mbox{ is even} \\ 0, \ \omega \mbox{ is odd} \end{cases}.$
As a first generating system for $\mathcal{B}$ (corresponding to $X$) we choose $$ \mathcal{A}=\{A\in \mathcal{B}:(\{0,1\}\in A \mbox{ and } \{2,3\}\in A^c) \mbox{ or } (\{1,2\}\in A \mbox{ and } \{0,3\}\in A^c) \}. $$ As a second generating system for $\mathcal{B}$ (corresponding to $Y$) we choose the Borel $\sigma-$field $\mathcal{B}$ itself.
Let us check that $\mathcal{A}$ generates $\mathcal{B}.$ Note that $$ \{0,1\}\in \mathcal{A}, \{1,2\}\in\mathcal{A}. $$ Then $$ \{1\}=\{0,1\}\cap\{1,2\}\in \sigma(\mathcal{A}). $$ It follows that one point sets $\{0\},\{1\},\{2\}$ belong to $\sigma(\mathcal{A}).$ Now, if $B$ is a Borel set and $3\not\in B,$ then $$ \tilde{B}=(B\setminus \{0,1,2\})\cap \{0,1\}\in\mathcal{A} $$ Starting from the set $\tilde{B}$ we can add or remove singletons $\{0\},\{1\},\{2\}$ and stay in $\sigma(\mathcal{A}).$ Clearly, performing these operations we will get $B,$ so $B\in\sigma(\mathcal{A}).$ If $3\in B,$ then $3\not\in B^c$ and $B^c\in\sigma(\mathcal{A}).$ It follows that $\mathcal{A}$ generates $\mathcal{B}.$
Now, let $A\in\mathcal{A}$ be such that $\{0,1\}\in A.$ Then $$ P(X\in A, Y=1)=P(\{\omega\in\{0,1\}:\omega \mbox{ is even}\})=P(\{0\})=\frac{1}{4} $$ Let $A\in\mathcal{A}$ be such that $\{1,2\}\in A.$ Then $$ P(X\in A, Y=1)=P(\{\omega\in\{1,2\}:\omega \mbox{ is even}\})=P(\{2\})=\frac{1}{4} $$ Independence condition holds for all sets from generating families. However, $X$ and $Y$ are dependent, as $$ P(X=1,Y=1)=0\ne P(X=1)P(Y=1) $$