Let $T^2=S^1\times S^1$. I'd like to know all de Rham cohomology groups of $M=T^2-\{a,b\}$ but I couldn't find a result. So I want to compute it and I'm thinking of using Mayer Vietoris sequence. I need two open sets whose union covers $M$. I'm having difficulty choosing these open sets. Any help is appreciated.
2026-03-26 08:03:22.1774512202
de Rham cohomology of doubly punctured torus
637 Views Asked by user264750 https://math.techqa.club/user/user264750/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-TOPOLOGY
- How to compute homology group of $S^1 \times S^n$
- the degree of a map from $S^2$ to $S^2$
- Show $f$ and $g$ are both homeomorphism mapping of $T^2$ but $f$ is not homotopy equivalent with $g.$
- Chain homotopy on linear chains: confusion from Hatcher's book
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Are these cycles boundaries?
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Bott and Tu exercise 6.5 - Reducing the structure group of a vector bundle to $O(n)$
- Cohomology groups of a torus minus a finite number of disjoint open disks
- CW-structure on $S^n$ and orientations
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-TOPOLOGY
- Getting a self-homeomorphism of the cylinder from a self-homeomorphism of the circle
- what is Sierpiński topology?
- Bott and Tu exercise 6.5 - Reducing the structure group of a vector bundle to $O(n)$
- The regularity of intersection of a minimal surface and a surface of positive mean curvature?
- What's the regularity of the level set of a ''semi-nondegenerate" smooth function on closed manifold?
- Help me to prove related path component and open ball
- Poincarè duals in complex projective space and homotopy
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
- Prove that the sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$ which are both open and closed are $\emptyset$ and $\mathbb{R}^n$
Related Questions in HOMOLOGY-COHOMOLOGY
- Are these cycles boundaries?
- Cohomology groups of a torus minus a finite number of disjoint open disks
- $f$ - odd implies $d(f)$ - odd, question to the proof
- Poincarè duals in complex projective space and homotopy
- understanding proof of excision theorem
- proof of excision theorem: commutativity of a diagram
- exact sequence of reduced homology groups
- Doubts about computation of the homology of $\Bbb RP^2$ in Vick's *Homology Theory*
- the quotien space of $ S^1\times S^1$
- Rational points on conics over fields of dimension 1
Related Questions in DE-RHAM-COHOMOLOGY
- DeRham Cohomology of punctured plane and homotopy.
- Chern-Weil homomorphism and Chern/Pontryagin/Euler class
- Finite dimensionality of the "deRham cohomology" defined using $C^{k,\alpha}$ forms instead of smooth forms.
- Averaging of a differential form.
- De Rham cohomology groups of projective real space
- Homotopy invariance of de Rham cohomology
- The Converse of Poincare Lemma
- How does one introduce characteristic classes
- There is no smooth diffeomorphism $f:\mathbb R^3 \setminus [-\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}]^3 \to \mathbb R^3$
- Why $H_{dR}^1(M) \simeq \mathbb R^n$ when $H_1(M,\mathbb Z)$ has $n$ generators?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Its easy to visualize when looking at the fundamental domain of the torus:
$U$ is a neighbourhood of $x$, $V$ is a neighbourhood of $y$. Removing $x$ and $y$ from the torus is homotopy equivalent to removing the whole neighbourhoods $U$ and $V$. Further we can choose $U,V$ so large, that they fill the entire triangle they lie in.
So the fundamental domain is homotopy equivalent to the union of the boundary of the square with the diagonal. But some parts of the boundary are identified with each other. Doing the identifications, we obtain the wedge sum of three circles (their common point is $A$). One circle corresponds to the left side = right side of the bundary, one circle corresponds to the top side = bottom side and one circle corresponds to the diagonal.
More precisely, first identifying top with bottom, we get two distinct edges connecting the bottom/top left vertex with the bottom/top right vertex (corresponding to the bottom/top edge and the diagonal) and two circles (corresponding to the left and right edges).
Then we identify the left and right edges. The two circles we already had get identified, and as the bottom/top left edge gets identified with the bottom/top right edge, the edges which previously connected these two vetices become circles.
So in the end we get three circles which are connected in their common point $A$, the bottom/top now left/right vertex.
I hope the detailled description did not make things more confusing. I probably should've also drawn this.