Angular line is a union of two half-lines with the same origin in the plane. Open angle is the set of all points which are on the same side of the angular line (they are on the same side if there is a polygonal line that connects two points and doesn't intersect the angular line). Now, I'm trying to prove that every angular line $pOq$ is generating a decomposition of a plane $π$ into two open angles. Given angular line $pOq$, consisting of half-lines $p, q$ with the same origin $O$, pick a random point $P$ on $p$ and point $Q$ on $q$. Then, choose a random point $A$ on the segment $PQ$ (such that $P-A-Q$). Next, on the line $AO$, choose a point $B$ such that $A-O-B$. Now, $π_1$ is the angle with points that are on the same side of the $pOq$ as the point $A$ and $π_2$ is the set of points that are on the same side of $pOq$ as the point B. How to prove that $π_1\cup π_2\cup pOq = π$ ?
2026-02-23 15:13:24.1771859604
Decomposition of a plane
108 Views Asked by user748736 https://math.techqa.club/user/user748736/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GEOMETRY
- Point in, on or out of a circle
- Find all the triangles $ABC$ for which the perpendicular line to AB halves a line segment
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- Asymptotes of hyperbola
- Finding the range of product of two distances.
- Constrain coordinates of a point into a circle
- Position of point with respect to hyperbola
- Length of Shadow from a lamp?
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
Related Questions in AXIOMATIC-GEOMETRY
- Is there a finite axiomatization of Tarski's geometry axioms?
- Playfair's Axiom for parallel planes instead of lines
- It is possible to prove that there are infinitely many points in space in Hilber'ts axiomatization of geometry?
- Hilbert axioms (groups I and II) and first theorem
- Does the Archimedean axiom guarantee a monotone and additive metric?
- Independency of Hilbert system's axioms
- A confusion about the second connection axiom of Euclidean Geometry
- How can affine plane extended of projective plane?
- Showing a Projective Plane has 7 Points and 6 Lines
- What's the need for Hilbert's 7th axiom of incidence?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Well, I think you will need the theorem that given the line $l$, it divides the plane into exactly two halfplanes i.e.
Theorem Given the line $l$, the two-argument relation $\sim_l$ over the set $\pi\setminus l$ given by the formula $$A\sim_l B :\iff l\cap\overline{AB}=\emptyset$$ is an equivalence relation with exactly two equivalence classes. ($\overline{AB}$ is the open segment).
We say that a set $h\subset \pi$ is an (open) halfplane whenever there exists a line $l$ such that $h$ is one of the equivalence classes of $\sim_l$. The line $l$ is called the boundary of $h$ and it is uniquely determined by $h$ (I think uniqueness is not necessary here).
Proposition. Any halflpane is a convex set. An intersection of a family of convex sets is convex.
Lemma. Given a line $l$ and and an (open) halfline $r$ with origin $O\in l$, either $r\subset l$ or $r\subset h$ for exactly one of the halfplanes determined by $l$.
Assume we are given two halflines $p,q$ with the same origin $O$ such that they are not contained in one line. Let $l_p, l_q$ be the lines containing $p,q$ respectively. By lemma $q$ is contained in exactly one halplane with boundary $l_p$. Denote it by $h_{pq}$ and denote complementary halfplane by $h_{pq}^*$. Similarly define $h_{qp}$ and $h_{qp}^*$. Observe that $p^*\subset h_{qp}^*,q^*\subset h_{pq}^*$.
Now let's follow your construction. First notice that $A\in h_{pq}\cap h_{qp}$ and $B\in h_{pq}^*\cap h_{qp}^*$ (I leave out an easy proof for you). We must prove that $\pi_1\cup\pi_2\cup pOq=\pi$. So let $M\in \pi$ be an arbitrary point. Of course $$M\in\pi=l_p\cup h_{pq}\cup h_{pq}^*=\{O\}\cup p\cup p^*\cup h_{pq}\cup h_{pq}^*$$ and similarly $$M\in\pi=l_q\cup h_{qp}\cup h_{qp}^*=\{O\}\cup q\cup q^*\cup h_{qp}\cup h_{qp}^*$$ Combining these we get few cases:
$M\in h_{pq}\cap h_{qp}$. By convexity of $h_{pq}\cap h_{qp}$ we know that a segment $\overline{AM}$ lies entirely within this set and hence it does not intersect the lines $l_p,l_q$ and as a consequence it does not intersect $pOq$. So $M\in\pi_1$.
$M\in h_{pq}^*$. By convexity of $h_{pq}^*$ segment $\overline{BM}$ lies entirely within this set. Hence it does not intersect $l_p$ and consequently $p\cup\{O\}$. Suppose it intersects $q$ in a point $X$. Then $X\in \overline{BM}\subset h_{pq}^*$ and $X\in q\subset h_{pq}$, but these halfplanes are disjoint. A Contradiction. Hence $M\in \pi_2$.
$M\in h_{qp}^*$. A case symmetric to case 2.
$M\in l_p\setminus h_{qp}^*$. Since $p^*\subset h_{qp}^*$, $M\in p\cup\{O\}\subset pOq$.
$M\in l_q\setminus h_{pq}^*$. A case symmetric to case 4.