Suppose we have $f:\mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ which is of bounded variation. I would like to show that it can be presented as a sum of left and right continuous functions of bounded variation. Actually I have no idea how to prove that since I think it can't be proven that Jordan decomposition has that properties and direct constructions failed in a way I can't prove them to be right.
2026-03-27 18:00:05.1774634405
Decomposition of function of bounded variation
1.1k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in FUNCTIONS
- Functions - confusion regarding properties, as per example in wiki
- Composition of functions - properties
- Finding Range from Domain
- Why is surjectivity defined using $\exists$ rather than $\exists !$
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Lower bound of bounded functions.
- Does there exist any relationship between non-constant $N$-Exhaustible function and differentiability?
- Given a function, prove that it's injective
- Surjective function proof
- How to find image of a function
Related Questions in BOUNDED-VARIATION
- Method for evaluating Darboux integrals by a sequence of partitions?
- Function of bounded variation which is differentiable except on countable set
- Variation with respect to the projective tensor norm of a matrix of bounded variation functions
- Associativity of an integral against a function with finite variation
- Suppose $f(x)$ is of bounded variation. Show $F(x) = \frac{1}{x} \int_0^x f(t) \, dt$ is also of bounded variation.
- Is there a sufficient condition for which derivative of $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n x^n$ is bounded for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$?
- Looking for the name of this property, if it has one.
- Bounded Variation Proof
- Rearranging a sequence of bounded variation
- If $f$ is $g$-Riemann-Stieltjes integrable on $[a,b]$, prove that it's $g$-RS-integrable on $[a,c] \subset [a,b]$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
My guess is that the OP has already solved the problem. For other readers irritated by cryptic hints, here are some more details.
As already indicated the problem is really just a refinement of the usual version one finds:
Instead, we ask as well for the saltus part to be split into two nicer pieces:
Let $\{x_n\}$ be the sequence of discontinuities of $f$ and let $a_n=f(x_n)-f(x_n-)$ and $b_n=f(x_n+)-f(x_n)$ be the two one-sided jumps. (One or both of these are nonzero.)
Write $I(x)=0$ for $x<0$ and $I(x)=1$ for $x\geq 0$. Write $J(x)=0$ for $x\leq 0$ and $J(x)=1$ for $x> 0$.
Then the saltus function for $f$ is the function
$$s(x)= \sum_{n=1}^\infty \left\{ a_n I(x-x_n)+ b_nJ(x-x_n)\right\}.$$
The usual textbook proof one can find checks the details to see that $s$ is well-defined, that $f-s$ is continuous and has bounded variation. And $s$ is a saltus function by definition. This is probably the standard proof for A.
To get the version B just split the series into two series; one half is a right-continuous saltus $s_R$ and the other is a left-continuous saltus $s_L$.