Let $T: Dom(T) \rightarrow \scr H$ be a symmetric operator.
Prove the following:
$T$ admits self-adjoint extensions iff $d_+ = d_-$, where $d_\pm = dim \ Ker(T^\dagger \pm i \mathbb{I})$
The proof I'm studying uses the Cayley transforms, but at some point I get stuck. Here's part of the proof.
- Let $S = S^\dagger $ be a self-adjoint extension of $T$. Its Cayley transform $U = (S-i\mathbb{I})(S+ i \mathbb{I})^{-1}$ is unitary (this fact was proven in a previous theorem) and extends the Cayley Transform of $T$, which we'll call $V$. So, in symbols: $T \subset S \implies V \subset U$ (this implication is not proven; I don't find it obvious but ok). The restriction $\left. U \right |_{DomV}$ is injective, because $U$ is injective by hypothesis, and maps $Ran (T+ i \mathbb{I}) $ to $Ran (T- i \mathbb{I}) $. Here’s the problem: $$\psi \in \{ Ran (T+ i \mathbb{I}) \}^{\perp} \iff U\psi \in \{ Ran (T-i \mathbb{I}) \} ^{\perp}$$
and the only reason given for it is “$U$ is unitary”. Uhm, why?
Use tha fact that $U$ bijectively maps $Ran(T+iI)$ to $Ran(T-iI)$ by construction.
Now, $$\psi \in Ran(T+iI)^\perp$$ means $$\langle \psi, (T+iI) \phi\rangle=0\quad \mbox{ for every $\phi \in D(T)$.}$$ Since $U$ is bijective isometric, that is equivalent to $$\langle U\psi, U(T+iI) \phi\rangle=0\quad \mbox{ for every $\phi \in D(T)$,}$$ namely $$\langle U\psi, (T-iI) \phi\rangle=0\quad \mbox{ for every $\phi \in D(T)$.}$$ In other words, $$\psi \in Ran(T+iI)^\perp$$ is equivalent to $$U\psi \in Ran(T-iI)^\perp\:.$$