Let $M(\mathbb{R})$ be the space of finite signed measure on $(\mathbb{R})$. What is the norm defined on this space? From theorem 1.3.5 in Rudin Fourier analysis on groups. Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applies Mathematics, It is proved that $L^{1}(\mathbb{R})$ is a closed ideal in the space $M(\mathbb{R})$. What is the definition of closed ideal means here?
2026-03-30 11:58:44.1774871924
Definition of closed Ideal in the space of finite measures.
77 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in DEFINITION
- How are these definitions of continuous relations equivalent?
- If a set is open, does it mean that every point is an interior point?
- What does $a^b$ mean in the definition of a cartesian closed category?
- $\lim_{n\to \infty}\sum_{j=0}^{[n/2]} \frac{1}{n} f\left( \frac{j}{n}\right)$
- Definition of "Normal topological space"
- How to verify $(a,b) = (c,d) \implies a = c \wedge b = d$ naively
- Why wolfram alpha assumed $ x>0$ as a domain of definition for $x^x $?
- Showing $x = x' \implies f(x) = f(x')$
- Inferior limit when t decreases to 0
- Is Hilbert space a Normed Space or a Inner Product Space? Or it have to be both at the same time?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
A fairly standard norm in this case would be the total variation; in particular, for $\nu \in M(\mathbb{R})$, we define $$\| \nu\| = \lvert \nu \rvert (\mathbb{R}).$$ If I'm not mistaken, a closed ideal is simply an ideal (very much like those from ring theory) which is closed in the topology induced by the norm on $M(\mathbb{R})$.
Edit: To flesh out a few more details, first note that we can embed $L^1(\mathbb{R}) \hookrightarrow M(\mathbb{R})$ via the identification $f \mapsto \nu$, where $d\nu = fdm$ (or, equivalently, $\nu(E) = \int_E f \ dm$), where $m$ denotes Lebesgue measure. As Rudin notes in his text, multiplication of measures is defined by convolution. In particular, for $\lambda, \mu \in M(\mathbb{R})$, we define $$(\lambda * \mu)(E) = (\lambda \times \mu)(E_2),$$ where, in our case, $E_2 = \{ (x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 : x+y \in E \}$. We are almost ready to show that $L^1$ is an ideal of $M$. We just need to think about how to show that $\mu * \nu \in L^1$ for $\mu \in M$ and $\nu \in L^1$. Recall that the Radon-Nikodym theorem implies that if $\mu \in M$ is absolutely continuous with respect to $m$, then $d\mu = g dm$ for some $g \in L^1(\mathbb{R})$.
We can now show that $L^1$ is an ideal of $M$ by taking arbitrary $\nu "\in" L^1$ (ie, $d\nu = fdm$ for $f \in L^1$) and showing that $\mu * \nu \ll m$ for all $\mu \in M$ (see Rudin for the proof). This, of course, implies (again by Radon-Nikodym) that $d(\mu * \nu) = gdm$ for some $L^1$ function $g$. Therefore, $\mu * \nu \in L^1$ and so $L^1$ is an ideal of $M$. That $L^1$ is complete implies that $L^1$ is closed in $M$ and therefore $L^1$ is in fact a closed ideal of $M$.