We are using Artin's Algebra book for our Linear Algebra course. In Artin, det(A^T) = det(A) is proved using elementary matrices and invertibility. All of us feel that there should be a 'deeper' or a more fundamental or a more intuitive proof without using elementary matrices or invertibility. The one our prof came up with used linear transformations between tensor algebras, wedges and exterior algebras which we do not understand. Are there any other proofs for det(A^T) = det(A) ? Edit: also, is there a geometric proof? For the 2*2 case at least?
2026-03-26 22:17:51.1774563471
Bumbble Comm
On
Determinant of transpose intuitive proof
1.6k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
2
There are 2 best solutions below
2
Bumbble Comm
On
If $A$ is diagonalizable, so that there exists an invertible matrix $C$ such that $D=CAC^{-1}$ is diagonal, then $D=D^t=(CAC^{-1})^t=C^{-t}A^tC^t$. Since $D$ and $D^t$ have the same determinant, simply because the two matrices are in fact equal, it follows at once from this that $A$ and $A$ and $A^t$ have the same determinant.
As diagonalizable matrices are dense in $M_n(\mathbb C)$, and the map $A\in M_n(\mathbb C)\mapsto \det(A)-\det(A^t)\in\mathbb C$ is continuous, we see at once that this function is in fact constant. What you want follows from this.
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in TENSORS
- Linear algebra - Property of an exterior form
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- tensor differential equation
- Decomposing an arbitrary rank tensor into components with symmetries
- What is this notation?
- Confusion about vector tensor dot product
- Generalization of chain rule to tensors
- Tensor rank as a first order formula
- $n$-dimensional quadratic equation $(Ax)x + Bx + c = 0$
- What's the best syntax for defining a matrix/tensor via its indices?
Related Questions in EXTERIOR-ALGEBRA
- Does curl vector influence the final destination of a particle?
- How to get the missing brick of the proof $A \circ P_\sigma = P_\sigma \circ A$ using permutations?
- Is the exterior/wedge product of differential forms injective?
- trace of exterior product of a skew matrix $M$, $\bigwedge^kM$
- Question about notation in differential forms.
- A confusing formula in Clifford algebra
- Is there a non-degenerate solution for this PDE on $\mathbb{R}^3$?
- Using the 'wedge product'
- Does every connection admit a parallel volume form?
- Derivation of Green's theorem - I have wrong negative sign
Related Questions in TRANSPOSE
- Vectorization and transpose: how are $\text{vec}(W^T)$ and $\text{vec}(W)$ related?
- What can we say about two bases A and B for which the conversion matrix to a third base C is the transpose of the other
- Decomposition of the product of matrices
- Interpretation of transpose of a linear application from a matricial product point of view
- Derivative involving trace and Kronecker product
- What does a matrix multiplied by its transpose tell me about the matrix's inverse?
- Proving similarity of $A$ and $A^T$
- What does it mean when you say a matrix of of a linear transformation is relative to a standard basis?
- Matrix equation $Z - {}^t Z =c A Z$
- Prove that the characteristic polynmial of a skew mapping satisfies $c(-\lambda) = (-1)^n c(\lambda)$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The determinant of a matrix does not change when you compute it via cofactor expansion along column or row. Thus expanding along a row in $A$ is equivalent to expanding along a column in $A^t$. I'm not sure if this is what you meant by "using invertibility".