How can I determine the nash equilibria in the following matrix? $$\begin{pmatrix}-\pi,-\pi & e,0 \\ 0,e & -\pi,-\pi \end{pmatrix}$$
I know the definition of a Nash equilibrium, but because of the $-\pi$, it will always be the smallest value, so there wouldn't exist a Nash equilibrium....
I think I can still try something with minimax theorem but I dont know how to use it here. I also never seen the double value per matrixposition before... How do I interpret this? And how can I find the nash equilibria here?
Can someone help me here? Thanks in advance!
Edit: So my question is: how to find the nash equilbrium with mixed strategies.. (0,e) and (e,0) is obvious but I dont know how to find the mixed strategy nash equilibrium, thats why I mentioned minimax sorry for the unclear question.
Suppose that in the mixed strategy equilibrium player 1 is choosing the first option with probability $p$. It is a fact about Nash equilibria that player 2 is then indifferent between which of the two options she plays. For if she was not then she would only play the better strategy. But then player 1 would use the best response to that strategy, contradicting the fact that we were in a mixed strategy equilibrium. (This sort of reasoning is standard in game theory and I assume you are familiar with it.)
Thus $-p\pi+(1-p)e= p\cdot 0 -(1-p)\pi$. This implies that in equilibrium player 1 plays the first option with probability $\frac{e+\pi}{e+2\pi}$. The game is symmetric so player 2 does likewise.