Different versions of Mercer's theorem

1k Views Asked by At

I am reviewing materials on reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) and I've found various versions of Mercer's theorem:

  1. About the positive-definiteness conditions.

    In the Wikipedia pages on RKHS above or on the theorem itself, the condition is

    $$\sum_{i,j =1}^n c_i c_j K(x_i, x_j) \ge 0 , \forall n \in \mathbb{N},\ x_1, \dots, x_n \in X,\ \mbox{and}\ c_1, \dots, c_n \in \mathbb{R},$$

    while in some other materials (for example this, page 16), the condition becomes an integral:

    enter image description here

    In T. Hofmann et. al there is a short comment on this:

    enter image description here

    So according to the text they are different. Thus my first question is, what is the connection between these two conditions?

  2. About the function space of $K$.

    Again in the Wikipedia pages on Mercer's theorem, it mentions that $K$ is a Hilbert–Schmidt integral operator, which is like saying $K\in\mathcal{L}^2(\mathcal{X}^2)$ if I understand correctly. But in the attached slide above, it requires $K\in\mathcal{L}^\infty(\mathcal{X}^2)$, and gives $(\lambda_j)\in\ell_1$. This conclusion seems not covered by the spectral theory of compact and self-adjoint operators on Hilbert space, which only states a weaker result $\lambda_j\to 0$. It looks to me that $K\in\mathcal{L}^\infty(\mathcal{X}^2)$ helps give $(\lambda_j)\in\ell_1$. So my second question is, what is the general requirement of the function space for $K$, and how will the choice of spaces affect the properties of $(\lambda_j)$?