Difficulty understanding Spivak's description of a tangent line for functions of the form $c: \mathbb R \to \mathbb R^2$ in 4th Ed. of 'Calculus' book

41 Views Asked by At

In the Chapter 12 Appendix of Spivak's Calculus (4th Ed), the following paragraph is written about an arbitrary vector valued function $c$, which should be interpreted as $c: \mathbb R \to \mathbb R^2$. (Note that this is the only time in the book thus far that we have dealt with functions outside of $f:\mathbb R \to \mathbb R$)

Limits lead us of course to derivatives. For \begin{align} c(t)=(u(t),v(t))\end{align} we can define $c'$ by the straightforward definition \begin{align} c'(a)=(u'(a),v'(a)). \end{align} We could also try to imitate the basis definition: \begin{align}c'(a)=\displaystyle \lim_{h \to 0}\frac{c(a+h)-c(a)}{h}, \end{align}where the fraction on the right-hand side is understood to mean $\frac{1}{h}\cdot [c(a+h)-c(a)]$. As a matter of fact, these two definitions are equivalent, becaise \begin{align} \displaystyle\lim_{h \to 0}\frac{c(a+h)-c(a)}{h}&=\lim_{h \to 0}\left(\frac{u(a+h)-u(a)}{h},\frac{v(a+h)-v(a)}{h}\right)\\&=\lim_{h \to 0}\left(\lim_{h \to 0}\frac{u(a+h)-u(a)}{h},\lim_{h \to 0}\frac{v(a+h)-v(a)}{h}\right)\\&=\left(u'(a),v'(a)\right)\end{align} Figure $5$ shows $c(a+h)$ and $c(a)$, as well as the arrow from the $c(a)$ to $c(a+h)$; as we showed in Appendix $1$ to Chapter $4$, this arrow is $c(a+h)-c(a)$, except moved over so that it starts at $c(a)$. As $h \to 0$, this arrow would appear to move closer and closer to the tangent of our curve, so it seems reasonable to define $\color{red}{\text{the tangent line of } c \text{ at }c(a) \text{ to be the straight line along }c'(a)}$, when $c'(a)$ is moved over so that it starts at $c(a)$.

Figure 5

Using the attached image ('Figure $5$') as reference, I am hoping that someone could explain to me what Spivak is trying to convey in the sentence I have emphasized in $\color{red}{\text{red}}$.

Firstly, what does he mean by: "...the tangent line of $c$ at $c(a)$..."? Shouldn't this, instead, read as: "...the tangent line of $c$ at $\left(a,c(a) \right)$ "? I ask because when tangent lines are first introduced in the context of Spivak's Calculus, we are discussing functions of $f: \mathbb R \to \mathbb R$ and a tangent line is defined as:

...we define the tangent line to the graph of $f$ a $(a,f(a))$ to be the line through $(a,f(a))$ with slope $f'(a)$.

Secondly, what does he mean by:"...straight line along $c'(a)$..."? Clearly, $c'(a)$ is, itself, a vector...i.e. $c'(a) \in \mathbb R^2$. So I guess he is saying: "Place the line in the direction that $c'(a)$ is pointing"...but, once again, shouldn't the line be oriented in a 3D space (i.e. oriented along the same direction as $(1,c'(a))$?