Is this how one would express a sphere as a Dirac delta in Cartesian coordinates?
DiracDelta[Sqrt[R0^2-z^2-x^2],Sqrt[R0^2-z^2-y^2],Sqrt[R0^2-x^2-y^2]]
p 32 Barton et al gives the strong definition of the 3D (spherical coordinate) radial Dirac delta as:
$$\delta^3(\vec{r}) = \frac{\delta(r)}{4\pi r^2}\tag{1}$$
and, correspondingly in 2D (polar coordinate):
$$\delta^2(\vec{r}) = \frac{\delta(r)}{2\pi r}.\tag{2}$$
Since $4\pi r^2$ and $2\pi r$ measure the area and length of sphere and circle respectively, and the surface and line integrals of these two Dirac deltas are 1 (by definition) it seems natural to, in appropriate circumstances, use the radial Dirac delta in modeling density distributions, normalized to 1, over radial surfaces and radial lines respectively.
Is the thing you want something that yields the area of a spherical surface of radius
r0, when integrated over all space? Then, in spherical coordinates it'sr0^2 DiracDelta[r-r0], no? I believe that you may then substituteSqrt[x^2+y^2+z^2]forr, and get what you want, formally. Unfortunately, Mathematica seems not to understand such a thing.