I need to construct a divergence free, smooth, vector function on a unit circle such that
$ \mathbf{u} = (u_1,u_2) = (0,0) $ on $\partial B$, and $\int\limits_B u_i \neq 0, \ i=1,2$. I was able to find/construct few such functions, but all of them fail to satisfy the last condition.
Examples: 1) Hill's Spherical vortex $u = ( y(1-x^2-y^2), -x(1-x^2-y^2))$.
2) In 2d polar coordinates, $\nabla \cdot u = 0 \Rightarrow \frac{\partial (r v_r )}{\partial r} = - \frac{\partial v_\theta}{\partial \theta}$. So, e.g. let $ v_r = r^4(r-1)^3 \sin\theta \Rightarrow v_\theta = \left(5r^4(r-1)^3+ 3r^5(r-1)^2\right)\cos\theta $. From these, $v_1 = r^2(r-1)^2xy(4-7r), v_2 = r^2(r-1)^2\left( (r-1)y^2 + (8r-5)x^2 \right)$, where $r = \sqrt{x^2+y^2}$. But, $v_1, v_2$ have average value zero over the unit circle. So, is it always the case that average value is zero if we require smoothness? Anybody know any such function which does satisfy all conditions( maybe from Fluid Mechanics textbooks)?
Any help on these would be appreciated. Thanks!
2026-04-28 09:41:43.1777369303
Divergence free, smooth functions on unit circle.
609 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
A divergence-free vector field vanishing on the boundary can be thought of as the velocity field of an ideal fluid constrained to remain in $B$. The integral $\int_B \mathbf{u}$ (divided by the volume of $B$) is the velocity of the center of mass of the fluid. But the center of mass has nowhere to go: it's the center of $B$. Therefore $\int_B \mathbf{u}=0$.
If you prefer a "mathematical" proof, integrate by parts: $$\int_B \mathbf u\cdot \nabla f = -\int_B (\mathrm{div}\,\mathbf u)f = 0$$ with $f(x)=x_1$ or $f(x)=x_2$. Boundary term is zero because $\mathbf u=0$ on $\partial B$.
Another way, specific to two dimensions, is to use the fact that a divergence-free field, rotated by 90 degrees, becomes a curl-free (conservative) field, i.e., one of the form $\nabla f$. Since $\nabla f$ vanishes on the boundary, $f$ is constant on the boundary. Therefore, the integral of $f_{x_1}$ along every horizontal line is zero, and so is the integral of $f_{x_2}$ along every vertical line.
A somewhat similar problem (from Cambridge Mathematical Tripos) was quoted by Littlewood in his Miscellany:
Littlewood remarks
and destroys the problem with one sentence