I have to show that the divergence of this magnetic field is 0. I can do this pretty easily using the divergence theorem; however, if I try using try computing the divergence directly $\nabla B$ does not equal $0$.
To solve it indirectly I used the definition that defines the divergence as the limit of a surface integral. I chose a cylindrical surface and then showed that the flux through that surface is zero as the field lines form circles.
2026-04-04 12:00:16.1775304016
Divergence of magnetic field $B = \frac{\mu_0 I}{2\pi r}$
297 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MULTIVARIABLE-CALCULUS
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- $\iint_{S} F.\eta dA$ where $F = [3x^2 , y^2 , 0]$ and $S : r(u,v) = [u,v,2u+3v]$
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- optimization with strict inequality of variables
- How to find the unit tangent vector of a curve in R^3
- Prove all tangent plane to the cone $x^2+y^2=z^2$ goes through the origin
- Holding intermediate variables constant in partial derivative chain rule
- Find the directional derivative in the point $p$ in the direction $\vec{pp'}$
- Check if $\phi$ is convex
- Define in which points function is continuous
Related Questions in VECTOR-ANALYSIS
- Does curl vector influence the final destination of a particle?
- Gradient and Hessian of quadratic form
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Estimation of connected components
- Finding a unit vector that gives the maximum directional derivative of a vector field
- Gradient of transpose of a vector.
- Solve line integral
- Directional derivative: what is the relation between definition by limit and definition as dot product?
- Chain rule with intermediate vector function
- For which $g$ is $f(x)= g(||x||) \frac{x}{||x||}$ divergence free.
Related Questions in PHYSICS
- Why is the derivative of a vector in polar form the cross product?
- What is meant by input and output bases?
- Does Planck length contradict math?
- Computing relative error with ideal gas law.
- Planetary orbits in a $4$-dimensional universe
- Applied Maths: Equations of Motion
- Return probability random walk
- What will be the velocity of a photon ejected from the surface of cesium by a photon with a frequency of 6.12E14 s^-1?
- What mathematical principal allows this rearrangement during simplifying
- Time when velocity of object is zero and position at that point in time
Related Questions in DIRAC-DELTA
- What is the result of $x(at) * δ(t-k)$
- Solution to ODE with Dirac Delta satisfies ODE
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Approximating derivative of Dirac delta function using mollifiers
- How to prove this Dirac delta limit representation is correct?
- $\int_{-\epsilon}^\epsilon\delta(f(x))g(x)dx=\frac{g(0)}{f'(0)}$?
- Properties about Dirac Delta derivative
- Dirac / Fourier relation
- Prove that $\frac{1}{\epsilon}\int_{\mathbb{R}}f(t).\exp\left(\frac{-\pi(x-t)^2}{\epsilon^2}\right)dt \xrightarrow{\epsilon \to 0}f(x) $
- Integral involving delta functions and vector quantities
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The answer is quite simple. If I understand correctly, then you are solving the problem of a magnetic field around a infinite conductor with current. Writing down the equation for the magnetic field circulation, you got the $\phi$-th component of the magnetic field (only it is nonzero), i.e. \begin{equation} B_{\phi} = \frac{\mu_0 I}{2\pi r},\\ B_{z} = 0,\\ B_{r} = 0. \end{equation} The divergence in cylindrical coordinates is as follows \begin{equation} \vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{B} =\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial(r B_{r})}{\partial r} + \frac{\partial B_z}{\partial z} + \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial B_{\phi}}{\partial\phi}, \end{equation} which is in your case is \begin{equation} \vec{\nabla}\cdot\left(\frac{\mu_0 I}{2\pi r}\vec{e}_{\phi}\right) = \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial\left(\frac{\mu_0 I}{2\pi r}\right)}{\partial\phi} = 0, \end{equation} where $\vec{e}_{\phi}$ is the unit vector along $\phi$.