We can define a topological current, \begin{equation} J_{top}^u = \frac{1}{2v} \epsilon^{\mu \nu} \partial_\nu \phi \end{equation} How to prove it divergenceless? where the the condition is $$\partial_uJ=0.$$
2026-04-09 05:25:32.1775712332
Divergenceless proving
66 Views Asked by user52950 https://math.techqa.club/user/user52950/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- PDE Separation of Variables Generality
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Harmonic Functions are Analytic Evan’s Proof
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Inhomogeneous biharmonic equation on $\mathbb{R}^d$
- PDE: Determine the region above the $x$-axis for which there is a classical solution.
- Division in differential equations when the dividing function is equal to $0$
Related Questions in PROBLEM-SOLVING
- How do you prevent being lead astray when you're working on a problem that takes months/years?
- How to prove the inequality $\frac{1}{n}+\frac{1}{n+1}+\cdots+\frac{1}{2n-1}\geq \log (2)$?
- How to solve higher order polynomial equations?
- Methods in finding invariant subspaces?
- Question about the roots of a complex polynomial
- Using a counting argument to prove some equalities? (Problem Solving)
- (Problem Solving) Proving $\sum_{k=0}^{n}(-1)^k\binom{n}{k}\frac{1}{k+m+1}=\sum_{k=0}^{m}(-1)^k\binom{m}{k}\frac{1}{k+n+1}$
- (Problem Solving) Proving $|x|^p +|y|^p \geq |x+y|^p$
- Each vertex of the square has a value which is randomly chosen from a set.
- Fill in the blanks
Related Questions in TENSOR-PRODUCTS
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Inclusions in tensor products
- How to prove that $f\otimes g: V\otimes W\to X\otimes Y$ is a monomorphism
- What does a direct sum of tensor products look like?
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
- Tensor modules of tensor algebras
- projective and Haagerup tensor norms
- Algebraic Tensor product of Hilbert spaces
- Why $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to+\infty}x_n\otimes y_n=x\otimes y\;?$
- Proposition 3.7 in Atiyah-Macdonald (Tensor product of fractions is fraction of tensor product)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
In answering this question, I am going to make a few assumptions which clarify the OP's statements and (hopefully) refine some of the definitions, both implicit and explicit, inherent in his post. I am going to go ahead and do this without resorting to the process of commenting and waiting for responses before answering; with luck, I'll hit the mark.
First of all, I'm taking the first equation, which defines $J$ (and please note I'm dropping the subscript "$top$" here), to read
$J^\mu = \frac{1}{2v}\epsilon^{\mu \nu} \partial_\nu \phi$,
and the second to be
$\partial_\mu J^\mu = 0$.
These assumptions merely correct what appear to be typographical errors, and make the indexing scheme consistent. Finally, I take $\epsilon^{\mu \nu}$ to be an antisymmetric symbol on two indices, meaning
1.) $\epsilon^{\mu \nu} = 0$ for $\mu = \nu$,
2.) $\epsilon^{\mu \nu} = (-1)^{\mu + \nu + 1}$ for $\nu > \mu$,
3.) $\epsilon^{\mu \nu} = -\epsilon^{\nu \mu}$ for $\nu < \mu$;
where it is assumed the indices run from $1$ to $N$, where $N$ is the dimension of the space under consideration. With these conventions, and assuming $v$ is constant and $\phi$ is sufficiently smooth, so that $\partial_\mu \partial_\nu \phi = \partial_\nu \partial_\mu \phi$, we have
$\partial_\alpha J^\mu = \frac{1}{2v}\epsilon^{\mu \nu} \partial_\alpha \partial_\nu \phi$;
then contracting on the indices $\alpha$, $\mu$, i.e., taking $\alpha = \mu$ and summing yields
$\partial_\mu J^\mu = \frac{1}{2v}\epsilon^{\mu \nu} \partial_\mu \partial_\nu \phi = -\frac{1}{2v}\epsilon^{\nu \mu} \partial_\mu \partial_\nu \phi = -\frac{1}{2v}\epsilon^{\nu \mu} \partial_\nu \partial_\mu \phi = -\partial_\nu J^\nu = -\partial_\mu J^\mu$,
whence
$\partial_\mu J^\mu = 0$,
since we are not operating over a field of characteristic 2!
Hope this helps. Cheers.