Given that Algebraic Extensions are vector spaces over fields is it possible to define an inner product?
2026-04-12 20:48:19.1776026899
Do Algebraic Extensions have Inner Products?
32 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in INNER-PRODUCTS
- Inner Product Same for all Inputs
- How does one define an inner product on the space $V=\mathbb{Q}_p^n$?
- Inner Product Uniqueness
- Is the natural norm on the exterior algebra submultiplicative?
- Norm_1 and dot product
- Is Hilbert space a Normed Space or a Inner Product Space? Or it have to be both at the same time?
- Orthonormal set and linear independence
- Inner product space and orthogonal complement
- Which Matrix is an Inner Product
- Proof Verification: $\left\|v-\frac{v}{\|v\|}\right\|= \min\{\|v-u\|:u\in S\}$
Related Questions in EXTENSION-FIELD
- Field $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)$ with $\alpha=\sqrt[3]7+2i$
- $\overline{A}\simeq\overline{k}^n $ implies $A\simeq K_1\times\cdots\times K_r$
- Extension of field, $\Bbb{R}(i \pi) = \Bbb{C} $
- A field extension of degree $\leq 2$
- Field not separable
- Intersections of two primitive field extensions of $\mathbb{Q}$
- Fields generated by elements
- Find the degree of splitting field of a separable polynomial over finite field
- Eigenvalues of an element in a field extension
- When a product of two primitive elements is also primitive?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If $K \to L$ is a finite extension, there's a canonically induced bilinear form on $L$ called the trace form, defined as follows. If $a \in L$, then multiplication by $a$ defines a linear transformation $L \to L$ which has a trace $\text{tr}(a)$, and the trace form is given by
$$L \times L \ni (a, b) \mapsto \text{tr}(ab) \in K.$$
This construction shows up in algebraic number theory. However, it's not really an inner product because there isn't enough structure to state the positivity requirements on an inner product at this level of generality.